"In two years, there were 22 military coups d'etat, essentially in Africa and the third world. The coup d'etat of Algiers, in 1965, is what opened the path"
About this Quote
Ben Bella’s line reads less like a statistic than a warning flare: coups weren’t isolated eruptions, they were becoming a contagious political method. By dropping the number first, he frames the mid-60s not as a hopeful postcolonial dawn but as a rushed, unstable marketplace of power, where governments could be swapped out like regimes on a timetable. The phrase “essentially in Africa and the third world” isn’t neutral geography; it’s an indictment of how newly independent states were being forced to govern under pressure-cooker conditions - fragile institutions, hungry armies, and economies still wired to former empires.
The key move is the pivot to Algiers, 1965. This is personal and political self-defense. Ben Bella was the one overthrown by Houari Boumediene, so “opened the path” casts Algeria’s coup as a precedent-setter, a permission structure. He’s not only naming a sequence; he’s assigning responsibility for normalizing military intervention as legitimate succession. The subtext is that once one “revolutionary” state tolerates a general stepping in “to save the nation,” the language of liberation can be repurposed to justify authoritarian housekeeping.
There’s also a colder implication: international actors learn fast. The era’s coups were rarely just domestic dramas; they were often lubricated by Cold War incentives and postcolonial leverage. Ben Bella’s sentence compresses that whole system into a grim lesson: independence without civilian control of the military isn’t sovereignty, it’s a revolving door.
The key move is the pivot to Algiers, 1965. This is personal and political self-defense. Ben Bella was the one overthrown by Houari Boumediene, so “opened the path” casts Algeria’s coup as a precedent-setter, a permission structure. He’s not only naming a sequence; he’s assigning responsibility for normalizing military intervention as legitimate succession. The subtext is that once one “revolutionary” state tolerates a general stepping in “to save the nation,” the language of liberation can be repurposed to justify authoritarian housekeeping.
There’s also a colder implication: international actors learn fast. The era’s coups were rarely just domestic dramas; they were often lubricated by Cold War incentives and postcolonial leverage. Ben Bella’s sentence compresses that whole system into a grim lesson: independence without civilian control of the military isn’t sovereignty, it’s a revolving door.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Ahmed
Add to List

