"In war, there are no winners"
About this Quote
The intent reads less like policy analysis and more like a moral interruption. It’s designed to stop the listener mid-sentence when they start talking about gains, victories, or necessary costs. The subtext is that “winning” is a story states tell themselves to metabolize trauma. Even when a side achieves its objectives, the aftermath leaks: bodies, displacement, ruined civic trust, a generation trained to normalize violence. “No winners” also implies something more accusatory: that war’s benefits tend to be privatized (power, territory, contracts) while its damage is socialized.
Contextually, the line fits a modern, media-saturated era where war is sold in high-definition and summarized in maps, where distance makes violence feel abstract. Kenoun’s phrasing pushes back against that abstraction, insisting on war as a system that degrades everyone it touches, including the so-called victors. It works because it denies the audience the comfort of ending the story with triumph.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Kenoun, Ramman. (2026, January 16). In war, there are no winners. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-war-there-are-no-winners-135272/
Chicago Style
Kenoun, Ramman. "In war, there are no winners." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-war-there-are-no-winners-135272/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"In war, there are no winners." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-war-there-are-no-winners-135272/. Accessed 26 Mar. 2026.










