"In what way can a revelation be made but by miracles? In none which we are able to conceive"
About this Quote
Paley’s line doesn’t argue for miracles so much as it tries to make them feel like the only honest option. “In what way” is a rhetorical trap: it invites a survey of alternatives (reason, tradition, moral intuition, inner experience) only to dismiss them with “In none which we are able to conceive.” The move is less about evidence than about narrowing the imagination. If revelation is defined as something that must arrive from outside ordinary human means, then “miracles” become not a claim to be tested but the default delivery system. The sentence quietly shifts the burden: skepticism is framed not as rigor but as a failure of conception.
Coming from a businessman, the cultural subtext reads differently than if it were a theologian’s sermon. This is a pitch with boardroom confidence: reveal the premise, close off the competitors, and present a single viable product. “We” does important work, too. It recruits the reader into a shared limitation, turning personal doubt into a collective cognitive boundary. That inclusive pronoun also creates an aura of common sense: if we can’t picture revelation without miracles, then demanding a non-miraculous revelation starts to look like demanding a triangle without angles.
Contextually, the quote sits in the long fight between Enlightenment suspicion of the supernatural and the religious need for public, legible proof. Paley’s formulation takes a moment of modern uncertainty and answers it with a hard-edged certainty: if God speaks, the message must come stamped with spectacle. It’s persuasive because it turns metaphysics into logistics, and logistics into inevitability.
Coming from a businessman, the cultural subtext reads differently than if it were a theologian’s sermon. This is a pitch with boardroom confidence: reveal the premise, close off the competitors, and present a single viable product. “We” does important work, too. It recruits the reader into a shared limitation, turning personal doubt into a collective cognitive boundary. That inclusive pronoun also creates an aura of common sense: if we can’t picture revelation without miracles, then demanding a non-miraculous revelation starts to look like demanding a triangle without angles.
Contextually, the quote sits in the long fight between Enlightenment suspicion of the supernatural and the religious need for public, legible proof. Paley’s formulation takes a moment of modern uncertainty and answers it with a hard-edged certainty: if God speaks, the message must come stamped with spectacle. It’s persuasive because it turns metaphysics into logistics, and logistics into inevitability.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by William
Add to List











