"Incredible that liberals aren't more concerned about the monopoly of information in South Dakota"
About this Quote
The phrase “monopoly of information” also smuggles in a bigger narrative about control: not simply who owns newspapers or TV stations, but who gets to set the terms of reality. It’s elastic enough to gesture at everything from local media ownership to universities, public health officials, and national outlets “parachuting” into flyover country. By choosing South Dakota, she taps a symbolic landscape: heartland, rural, red-state America imagined as both overlooked and patronized, where “liberal” institutions are cast as distant puppet masters even when conservatives dominate elected offices.
Contextually, this lands in the post-2016 media environment where distrust of mainstream journalism is a political identity marker. It’s less a policy critique than a reputational play: redefining “anti-monopoly” and “free speech” as conservative concerns, while implying that liberals only protest concentrated power when it serves them. The intent isn’t to solve information scarcity; it’s to turn it into a moral tell.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Ingraham, Laura. (2026, January 16). Incredible that liberals aren't more concerned about the monopoly of information in South Dakota. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/incredible-that-liberals-arent-more-concerned-99724/
Chicago Style
Ingraham, Laura. "Incredible that liberals aren't more concerned about the monopoly of information in South Dakota." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/incredible-that-liberals-arent-more-concerned-99724/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Incredible that liberals aren't more concerned about the monopoly of information in South Dakota." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/incredible-that-liberals-arent-more-concerned-99724/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.

