"India and Japan should develop a complementary relationship in information technology"
About this Quote
In Yoshiro Mori's tidy phrase, "complementary relationship" does a lot of diplomatic heavy lifting. It avoids the blunt language of rivalry or dependence and instead sells partnership as inevitability: two countries with different strengths can fit together like components in a supply chain. For a Japanese politician of Mori's era, that word choice is strategic. It reassures domestic audiences that Japan won't be "outsourced" by a rising IT power, while signaling to India that Japan is open to deeper ties without sounding patronizing.
The intent sits at the intersection of economics and geopolitics. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, Japan was searching for new engines after the burst of the asset bubble, while India was emerging as a global hub for software services and engineering talent. A "complementary" IT relationship implies a division of labor: Japan contributes capital, hardware prowess, manufacturing ecosystems, and demanding enterprise clients; India provides scalable software development, back-end services, and a growing pool of English-speaking engineers. It frames globalization not as a zero-sum contest but as a design problem: assemble the best parts.
Subtext: anxiety about being left behind. Japan's reputation for consumer electronics didn't automatically translate into dominance in the internet-and-software economy. By proposing complementarity, Mori casts collaboration as a way to keep Japan relevant in the next technological chapter, while also nudging India toward alignment with Japan's standards, business culture, and strategic orbit. It's a soft-power pitch dressed up as economic common sense.
The intent sits at the intersection of economics and geopolitics. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, Japan was searching for new engines after the burst of the asset bubble, while India was emerging as a global hub for software services and engineering talent. A "complementary" IT relationship implies a division of labor: Japan contributes capital, hardware prowess, manufacturing ecosystems, and demanding enterprise clients; India provides scalable software development, back-end services, and a growing pool of English-speaking engineers. It frames globalization not as a zero-sum contest but as a design problem: assemble the best parts.
Subtext: anxiety about being left behind. Japan's reputation for consumer electronics didn't automatically translate into dominance in the internet-and-software economy. By proposing complementarity, Mori casts collaboration as a way to keep Japan relevant in the next technological chapter, while also nudging India toward alignment with Japan's standards, business culture, and strategic orbit. It's a soft-power pitch dressed up as economic common sense.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Yoshiro
Add to List




