"Instead of this absurd division into sexes they ought to class people as static and dynamic"
About this Quote
Waugh’s line lands like a cocktail-party grenade: elegant, funny, and quietly vicious. He calls the division into sexes “absurd” not because he’s staging a modern manifesto, but because he’s skewering how society mistakes a blunt biological category for a complete account of character. The alternative taxonomy - “static and dynamic” - is a Waugh move: replace a supposedly natural hierarchy with a more revealing, more cruelly observant one.
“Static” and “dynamic” read as temperaments, but also as social roles. Static people preserve, repeat, inherit, keep the club running; dynamic people disrupt, invent, seduce, and make scenes. In Waugh’s world, the real drama is not men versus women but the living versus the embalmed: those who treat life as a set of rules to be performed versus those who use it as material. The joke is that this classification is no less judgmental than the one he dismisses; it’s just a better tool for sorting winners, bores, and casualties.
Context matters: Waugh writes from early-to-mid 20th century Britain, when gender was both rigidly policed and constantly performed. His fiction is crowded with people trapped in manners and institutions (church, family, class) that demand stillness. So the line doubles as a critique of gender essentialism and a broader attack on social inertia. The wit works because it flatters the reader’s desire to be “dynamic” while exposing how eagerly we accept any system that lets us rank others.
“Static” and “dynamic” read as temperaments, but also as social roles. Static people preserve, repeat, inherit, keep the club running; dynamic people disrupt, invent, seduce, and make scenes. In Waugh’s world, the real drama is not men versus women but the living versus the embalmed: those who treat life as a set of rules to be performed versus those who use it as material. The joke is that this classification is no less judgmental than the one he dismisses; it’s just a better tool for sorting winners, bores, and casualties.
Context matters: Waugh writes from early-to-mid 20th century Britain, when gender was both rigidly policed and constantly performed. His fiction is crowded with people trapped in manners and institutions (church, family, class) that demand stillness. So the line doubles as a critique of gender essentialism and a broader attack on social inertia. The wit works because it flatters the reader’s desire to be “dynamic” while exposing how eagerly we accept any system that lets us rank others.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Evelyn
Add to List
