"Integrity without knowledge is weak and useless, and knowledge without integrity is dangerous and dreadful"
About this Quote
Johnson is doing what he does best: turning a moral intuition into a balanced instrument with a blade on both ends. The line reads like a tidy aphorism, but its intent is combative. He is arguing against two fashionable evasions at once: the pious person who thinks goodness alone is enough, and the clever person who thinks cleverness excuses everything.
The first clause punctures sentimental virtue. “Integrity” on its own can be mere stubbornness, a well-meaning refusal to learn. Without “knowledge,” integrity can’t navigate consequences; it becomes “weak and useless,” a conscience that wants credit but lacks competence. Johnson, the great cataloger of language and human motives, had little patience for morality performed as a substitute for understanding.
The second clause is the sharper warning, because it targets power. In the 18th century, “knowledge” wasn’t a private self-improvement project; it was increasingly institutional: print culture, science, bureaucracy, empire. Knowledge multiplied reach. Johnson’s “dangerous and dreadful” isn’t melodrama; it’s a diagnosis. Expertise without restraint turns into manipulation, rationalized cruelty, the kind of intelligence that can justify anything because it can explain everything.
What makes the sentence work is its symmetry and its escalation. “Weak and useless” sounds like wasted potential; “dangerous and dreadful” sounds like a threat. Johnson implies a hierarchy of harms: ignorance plus virtue is sad, but knowledge plus vice is catastrophic. It’s an Enlightenment-era reminder that progress isn’t self-cleaning. The mind’s horsepower needs a steering wheel, and the steering wheel needs a map.
The first clause punctures sentimental virtue. “Integrity” on its own can be mere stubbornness, a well-meaning refusal to learn. Without “knowledge,” integrity can’t navigate consequences; it becomes “weak and useless,” a conscience that wants credit but lacks competence. Johnson, the great cataloger of language and human motives, had little patience for morality performed as a substitute for understanding.
The second clause is the sharper warning, because it targets power. In the 18th century, “knowledge” wasn’t a private self-improvement project; it was increasingly institutional: print culture, science, bureaucracy, empire. Knowledge multiplied reach. Johnson’s “dangerous and dreadful” isn’t melodrama; it’s a diagnosis. Expertise without restraint turns into manipulation, rationalized cruelty, the kind of intelligence that can justify anything because it can explain everything.
What makes the sentence work is its symmetry and its escalation. “Weak and useless” sounds like wasted potential; “dangerous and dreadful” sounds like a threat. Johnson implies a hierarchy of harms: ignorance plus virtue is sad, but knowledge plus vice is catastrophic. It’s an Enlightenment-era reminder that progress isn’t self-cleaning. The mind’s horsepower needs a steering wheel, and the steering wheel needs a map.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|---|
| Source | Unverified source: The History of Rasselas, Prince of Abissinia (Samuel Johnson, 1759)
Evidence: Chapter 41 ("The Astronomer discovers the cause of his uneasiness"). The line appears verbatim in Chapter 41, spoken by the astronomer to Imlac: “Integrity without knowledge is weak and useless, and knowledge without integrity is dangerous and dreadful.” A reliable, directly-readable primary-text... Other candidates (1) Samuel Johnson (Samuel Johnson) compilation98.7% them chapter 31 integrity without knowledge is weak and useless and knowledge without integrity is dangerous and drea... |
More Quotes by Samuel
Add to List








