"International institutions ought to be, as the national ones in democratic countries, established by the peoples and for the peoples"
About this Quote
Democracy is being smuggled across borders here, not as a slogan but as an architectural demand. Henri La Fontaine, a lawyer and Nobel-era internationalist, isn’t praising “cooperation” in the abstract; he’s laying down a standard of legitimacy. “Ought to be” reads like courtroom language: a normative claim meant to shame the gap between what exists and what’s defensible. International bodies in his time were largely clubhouses of statesmen and empires, operating through treaties negotiated above the heads of ordinary people. La Fontaine’s line insists that if global institutions are to wield authority, they need the same moral wiring democratic states claim at home: consent, representation, and accountability.
The phrase “as the national ones” is doing quiet work. It assumes the democratic nation-state as the baseline model, then flips it into an indictment: why should sovereignty become less democratic the moment it becomes international? The subtext is a warning about technocracy before the word became fashionable. If international institutions are built only “by governments,” they will drift toward elite insulation, legalism without buy-in, and enforcement without a public that recognizes itself in the system.
Context matters: La Fontaine was active in the peace movement and the early infrastructure of global governance that would eventually feed into the League of Nations. After the industrialized slaughter of World War I, “the peoples” wasn’t sentimental; it was a political category newly mobilized by mass suffrage, labor movements, and nationalism. He’s trying to harness that force for peace: not just to prevent wars, but to make international law feel less like diplomacy and more like citizenship.
The phrase “as the national ones” is doing quiet work. It assumes the democratic nation-state as the baseline model, then flips it into an indictment: why should sovereignty become less democratic the moment it becomes international? The subtext is a warning about technocracy before the word became fashionable. If international institutions are built only “by governments,” they will drift toward elite insulation, legalism without buy-in, and enforcement without a public that recognizes itself in the system.
Context matters: La Fontaine was active in the peace movement and the early infrastructure of global governance that would eventually feed into the League of Nations. After the industrialized slaughter of World War I, “the peoples” wasn’t sentimental; it was a political category newly mobilized by mass suffrage, labor movements, and nationalism. He’s trying to harness that force for peace: not just to prevent wars, but to make international law feel less like diplomacy and more like citizenship.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Henri
Add to List





