"Into this, for good or ill, is woven every belief of every man who has speech of his fellows. A awful privilege, and an awful responsibility, that we should help to create the world in which posterity will live"
About this Quote
Language isn’t just how Clifford’s world explains itself; it’s how it gets built. In two tight sentences, the Victorian mathematician treats belief as infrastructure: every spoken conviction becomes a thread in a shared fabric that outlasts its speaker. The phrasing “for good or ill” is doing quiet, ruthless work. It strips away the comforting fantasy that sincerity guarantees virtue. Your beliefs might be noble; once voiced, they still enter circulation, get repurposed, misunderstood, weaponized, normalized.
Clifford’s choice of “woven” is telling. Weaving suggests accumulation, interdependence, and irreversibility. You don’t get to “un-say” a thread once it’s in the cloth; you only add more thread, hoping the pattern changes. That’s a bracingly modern view of discourse, closer to how social media functions than to the gentlemanly debate culture we associate with his era. Speech is less self-expression than social engineering.
Context matters: Clifford is best known for arguing that it is wrong to believe on insufficient evidence. Read alongside that ethic, this passage becomes a moral escalation. Bad reasoning isn’t merely a private flaw; it is civic pollution. “Awful privilege” and “awful responsibility” lean on the older sense of “awful” as awe-inducing, not just unpleasant. He’s invoking near-religious gravity without religious consolation: no absolution, no deus ex machina, just the stark fact that posterity inherits what we normalize. The subtext is a warning to intellectuals and ordinary talkers alike: the future is not an abstract idea. It’s the downstream consequence of what we choose to treat as believable today.
Clifford’s choice of “woven” is telling. Weaving suggests accumulation, interdependence, and irreversibility. You don’t get to “un-say” a thread once it’s in the cloth; you only add more thread, hoping the pattern changes. That’s a bracingly modern view of discourse, closer to how social media functions than to the gentlemanly debate culture we associate with his era. Speech is less self-expression than social engineering.
Context matters: Clifford is best known for arguing that it is wrong to believe on insufficient evidence. Read alongside that ethic, this passage becomes a moral escalation. Bad reasoning isn’t merely a private flaw; it is civic pollution. “Awful privilege” and “awful responsibility” lean on the older sense of “awful” as awe-inducing, not just unpleasant. He’s invoking near-religious gravity without religious consolation: no absolution, no deus ex machina, just the stark fact that posterity inherits what we normalize. The subtext is a warning to intellectuals and ordinary talkers alike: the future is not an abstract idea. It’s the downstream consequence of what we choose to treat as believable today.
Quote Details
| Topic | Legacy & Remembrance |
|---|
More Quotes by William
Add to List
