"Iran has long sponsored terrorists who carry out homicide bombings in Israeli cities. However, it is a mistake to believe the danger Iran poses is directed at Israel alone"
About this Quote
A politician’s most reliable instrument is the pivot, and John Doolittle builds his case on one. He begins with a vivid, emotionally loaded claim - “homicide bombings in Israeli cities” - that invites moral certainty and a clear victim-perpetrator frame. The phrase “homicide bombings” (instead of the more common “suicide bombings”) subtly shifts attention from the attacker’s self-destruction to the victim’s death, sharpening outrage and narrowing empathy. It’s a lexical choice designed to make debate feel like equivocation.
Then comes the strategic turn: “However, it is a mistake to believe…” The subtext isn’t simply that Iran is dangerous; it’s that any Israel-focused concern is parochial, even naive. Doolittle is widening the circle of threatened listeners. If the risk is “not… directed at Israel alone,” then American audiences are meant to hear themselves as implicated, and policy escalation becomes framed as self-defense rather than alliance politics.
Context matters: Doolittle’s career sits squarely in the post-9/11 era when “state sponsor of terror” rhetoric functioned as an all-purpose justification for sanctions, covert action, and the possibility of war. The line also performs a familiar domestic political task: it preempts accusations of acting primarily on behalf of a foreign ally by claiming a universal stake. It’s not just a warning about Iran; it’s a map for coalition-building at home, where fear is converted into consensus and distance is rhetorically erased.
Then comes the strategic turn: “However, it is a mistake to believe…” The subtext isn’t simply that Iran is dangerous; it’s that any Israel-focused concern is parochial, even naive. Doolittle is widening the circle of threatened listeners. If the risk is “not… directed at Israel alone,” then American audiences are meant to hear themselves as implicated, and policy escalation becomes framed as self-defense rather than alliance politics.
Context matters: Doolittle’s career sits squarely in the post-9/11 era when “state sponsor of terror” rhetoric functioned as an all-purpose justification for sanctions, covert action, and the possibility of war. The line also performs a familiar domestic political task: it preempts accusations of acting primarily on behalf of a foreign ally by claiming a universal stake. It’s not just a warning about Iran; it’s a map for coalition-building at home, where fear is converted into consensus and distance is rhetorically erased.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List

