"Iran stands behind a substantial number of terrorist actions against us, together with Hizballah and the Islamic Jihad. It pretends to care for the Palestinians"
About this Quote
Katsav’s line is built to do two things at once: assign blame and strip an adversary of moral cover. By pairing “a substantial number of terrorist actions” with named proxies (“Hizballah and the Islamic Jihad”), he doesn’t just accuse Iran of hostility; he sketches a networked threat, the kind that feels both pervasive and deniable. The phrasing matters. “Stands behind” is courtroom language without a courtroom: it implies authorship while sidestepping the burden of public proof, inviting the listener to treat suspicion as settled fact.
The second sentence is the rhetorical knife. “It pretends to care for the Palestinians” reframes Iran’s pro-Palestinian posture as performance, not solidarity. That move isn’t aimed only at Tehran; it’s aimed at international audiences who might see Iranian support as part of a broader anti-occupation narrative. Katsav tries to collapse that narrative into a simpler moral binary: terrorism dressed up as compassion.
Contextually, this is classic Israeli state messaging from the era when Iran’s regional influence and ties to militant groups were central to Israel’s security diplomacy. The subtext is strategic: if Iran is a sponsor of violence rather than a stakeholder in Palestinian rights, then calls to engage it politically become naive, and pressure campaigns (sanctions, isolation, military preparedness) become not just justified but urgent. It’s less a description than a bid to control the frame through which the conflict is interpreted.
The second sentence is the rhetorical knife. “It pretends to care for the Palestinians” reframes Iran’s pro-Palestinian posture as performance, not solidarity. That move isn’t aimed only at Tehran; it’s aimed at international audiences who might see Iranian support as part of a broader anti-occupation narrative. Katsav tries to collapse that narrative into a simpler moral binary: terrorism dressed up as compassion.
Contextually, this is classic Israeli state messaging from the era when Iran’s regional influence and ties to militant groups were central to Israel’s security diplomacy. The subtext is strategic: if Iran is a sponsor of violence rather than a stakeholder in Palestinian rights, then calls to engage it politically become naive, and pressure campaigns (sanctions, isolation, military preparedness) become not just justified but urgent. It’s less a description than a bid to control the frame through which the conflict is interpreted.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Moshe
Add to List

