"Iraq did nothing to us. Iraq was not responsible for 9/11"
About this Quote
A blunt sentence like this is less a statement of opinion than an accusation: not against Iraq, but against the machinery that needed Iraq to be guilty. Charles Evers, a civil rights-era activist with a lifetime of watching power justify itself, strips away the comforting fog of post-9/11 vengeance and names the category error at the heart of the Iraq War. The repetition - "Iraq did nothing... Iraq was not responsible" - works like a gavel strike. It denies the listener the rhetorical escape hatch of ambiguity.
The intent is corrective, but the subtext is moral: if you can be led into war on a false premise, you can be led into anything. Evers is also speaking to a domestic audience primed by fear, media shorthand, and political theater to fuse separate realities into one emotional narrative. After 9/11, grief became a national solvent, dissolving distinctions between perpetrators, bystanders, and convenient targets. Evers refuses that alchemy.
Coming from an activist rather than a policy wonk, the force is civic rather than technocratic. He isn't litigating intelligence failures; he's challenging a cultural reflex: the demand that trauma must cash out as retaliation, even if the receipt is forged. The line carries an older American lesson from the civil rights struggle: state narratives often ask the public to confuse order with justice. By insisting on factual linkage - who did what to whom - Evers asserts a radical baseline for democracy: accountability requires accuracy, and patriotism doesn't mean agreeing to misdirection.
The intent is corrective, but the subtext is moral: if you can be led into war on a false premise, you can be led into anything. Evers is also speaking to a domestic audience primed by fear, media shorthand, and political theater to fuse separate realities into one emotional narrative. After 9/11, grief became a national solvent, dissolving distinctions between perpetrators, bystanders, and convenient targets. Evers refuses that alchemy.
Coming from an activist rather than a policy wonk, the force is civic rather than technocratic. He isn't litigating intelligence failures; he's challenging a cultural reflex: the demand that trauma must cash out as retaliation, even if the receipt is forged. The line carries an older American lesson from the civil rights struggle: state narratives often ask the public to confuse order with justice. By insisting on factual linkage - who did what to whom - Evers asserts a radical baseline for democracy: accountability requires accuracy, and patriotism doesn't mean agreeing to misdirection.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List
