"Is a decision made in advance really any kind of choice"
About this Quote
Szymborska slips a philosophical knife into a plain sentence: if you’ve “decided in advance,” what exactly is left to choose? The line has the casual rhythm of an everyday question, but it’s really an indictment of the stories we tell ourselves about agency. “Decision” sounds active, even heroic; “in advance” quietly reveals the cheat. It suggests scripts masquerading as spontaneity, a life run on defaults: inherited beliefs, rehearsed opinions, reflexive loyalties. The quote works because it doesn’t argue; it corners you. It forces the reader to notice how often “choice” is just a retrospective label attached to momentum.
As a poet shaped by 20th-century Poland, Szymborska is never far from the politics of predetermined outcomes: the pressure to endorse the correct ideology, the “right” public emotions, the safe positions that keep you employed, published, unpunished. Under systems that reward conformity, a choice pre-made by fear or necessity isn’t freedom; it’s compliance with better branding. Yet the subtext lands just as hard in consumer democracies, where choice is often pre-curated: you pick between options selected by algorithms, institutions, family expectation, class. The decision feels personal because it happens inside your head, but the menu was written elsewhere.
The genius is the quote’s modesty. It refuses grand declarations and instead asks a childlike question that adults hate because it’s hard to dismiss. If the answer is “no,” then the uncomfortable follow-up is implied: how many of my “choices” were already chosen for me?
As a poet shaped by 20th-century Poland, Szymborska is never far from the politics of predetermined outcomes: the pressure to endorse the correct ideology, the “right” public emotions, the safe positions that keep you employed, published, unpunished. Under systems that reward conformity, a choice pre-made by fear or necessity isn’t freedom; it’s compliance with better branding. Yet the subtext lands just as hard in consumer democracies, where choice is often pre-curated: you pick between options selected by algorithms, institutions, family expectation, class. The decision feels personal because it happens inside your head, but the menu was written elsewhere.
The genius is the quote’s modesty. It refuses grand declarations and instead asks a childlike question that adults hate because it’s hard to dismiss. If the answer is “no,” then the uncomfortable follow-up is implied: how many of my “choices” were already chosen for me?
Quote Details
| Topic | Free Will & Fate |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Wislawa
Add to List
