"Islam's laws are fixed and that is why Islam is stable"
About this Quote
“Islam’s laws are fixed and that is why Islam is stable” is less a theological observation than a political sales pitch: rigidity as reassurance. Abu Bakar Bashir, an Indonesian cleric-activist long associated with hardline currents, frames “fixed” law as a kind of civilizational anchor in a world he implies is drifting. The sentence is doing two jobs at once. On the surface, it praises continuity in religious practice. Underneath, it smuggles in a rebuke of pluralism, reinterpretation, and democracy’s messy compromises by casting them as symptoms of instability.
The key move is the causal link: fixedness produces stability. That reads like common sense until you notice what’s been left out. Stability for whom? At what cost? In political rhetoric, “stability” often functions as a euphemism for control, and “fixed laws” can be code for foreclosing debate - especially the kinds of debate that emerge when societies confront women’s rights, minority protections, secular governance, or modern legal standards. Bashir’s phrasing compresses a contested legal tradition (Islamic jurisprudence has centuries of interpretive argument) into a monolith, which conveniently sidelines Muslims who insist the tradition is dynamic.
Contextually, the line resonates in post-authoritarian Indonesia, where rapid democratization, globalization, and cultural liberalization created real social churn. Bashir’s pitch targets that anxiety: if modern life feels chaotic, the promise of a settled rulebook looks like moral clarity. The subtext is an invitation to trade complexity for certainty - and to treat dissent as destabilization rather than citizenship.
The key move is the causal link: fixedness produces stability. That reads like common sense until you notice what’s been left out. Stability for whom? At what cost? In political rhetoric, “stability” often functions as a euphemism for control, and “fixed laws” can be code for foreclosing debate - especially the kinds of debate that emerge when societies confront women’s rights, minority protections, secular governance, or modern legal standards. Bashir’s phrasing compresses a contested legal tradition (Islamic jurisprudence has centuries of interpretive argument) into a monolith, which conveniently sidelines Muslims who insist the tradition is dynamic.
Contextually, the line resonates in post-authoritarian Indonesia, where rapid democratization, globalization, and cultural liberalization created real social churn. Bashir’s pitch targets that anxiety: if modern life feels chaotic, the promise of a settled rulebook looks like moral clarity. The subtext is an invitation to trade complexity for certainty - and to treat dissent as destabilization rather than citizenship.
Quote Details
| Topic | Quran |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Abu
Add to List