"It appears to suggest that I was removed because I was disabled - based on one occasion out of hundreds"
About this Quote
“It appears to suggest” is the tell: a public servant reaching for the language of caution while still aiming a flare at the institution he thinks wronged him. Gerald Walpin isn’t simply protesting a firing; he’s contesting the story that will survive him in the press and in the bureaucratic record. That opening clause performs restraint, almost legalistic, but it’s also a rhetorical move that invites readers to fill in what he won’t quite declare outright: they pushed me out because I’m disabled.
The phrase “removed” matters, too. It’s bloodless, procedural, the kind of verb agencies prefer when they want a personnel decision to read like a routine housekeeping matter. Walpin flips that administrative vocabulary back on its authors, implying that the process was tidy but the motive wasn’t. Then comes the knife twist: “based on one occasion out of hundreds.” He’s not just arguing disability discrimination; he’s arguing bad-faith selection, the classic workplace maneuver where a single incident is isolated, framed as disqualifying, and used to launder a decision made for other reasons.
Subtextually, it’s a plea for proportionality and for reputation. “Hundreds” is an appeal to an entire body of work that can’t be reduced to a snapshot, a demand that a career be judged by pattern rather than anecdote. Contextually, this reads like a fight over legitimacy inside government: the individual insisting on fairness and continuity, the system insisting on discretion and narrative control. The quote works because it’s both defense and indictment, calibrated to sound measured while making a moral accusation.
The phrase “removed” matters, too. It’s bloodless, procedural, the kind of verb agencies prefer when they want a personnel decision to read like a routine housekeeping matter. Walpin flips that administrative vocabulary back on its authors, implying that the process was tidy but the motive wasn’t. Then comes the knife twist: “based on one occasion out of hundreds.” He’s not just arguing disability discrimination; he’s arguing bad-faith selection, the classic workplace maneuver where a single incident is isolated, framed as disqualifying, and used to launder a decision made for other reasons.
Subtextually, it’s a plea for proportionality and for reputation. “Hundreds” is an appeal to an entire body of work that can’t be reduced to a snapshot, a demand that a career be judged by pattern rather than anecdote. Contextually, this reads like a fight over legitimacy inside government: the individual insisting on fairness and continuity, the system insisting on discretion and narrative control. The quote works because it’s both defense and indictment, calibrated to sound measured while making a moral accusation.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Gerald
Add to List