"It does seem fair to give them the option of a better return"
About this Quote
"It does seem fair to give them the option of a better return" is the kind of sentence politics loves: a soft-gloved pitch that sounds like simple decency while smuggling in an entire policy agenda. Paul Gillmor, a Midwestern Republican congressman with a reputation for business-friendly governance, isn’t arguing for a guaranteed outcome. He’s arguing for an "option" - a word that flatters American individualism and dodges responsibility. If the return is better, voters can credit the policy; if it isn’t, the system can shrug and say, you chose.
The genius of the line is its calibrated vagueness. "Them" is undefined, which allows the listener to supply a sympathetic group: workers, retirees, taxpayers. "Better return" is similarly elastic, invoking the moral logic of merit without naming the trade-offs: risk, fees, volatility, who benefits first. Gillmor’s phrasing borrows the language of markets and wraps it in the language of fairness, treating financial outcomes as something people are owed if the rules are tweaked the right way.
Contextually, Gillmor’s era in Congress was steeped in late-20th-century faith in privatization and investor logic, especially around retirement policy and public funds. The line reads like an argument for choice-based reforms (think partial privatization or expanded investment options) aimed at citizens framed less as protected beneficiaries and more as empowered consumers. It’s persuasion by understatement: no grand ideology, just "fairness" - a word that, in politics, often means "don’t look too closely at who takes on the risk."
The genius of the line is its calibrated vagueness. "Them" is undefined, which allows the listener to supply a sympathetic group: workers, retirees, taxpayers. "Better return" is similarly elastic, invoking the moral logic of merit without naming the trade-offs: risk, fees, volatility, who benefits first. Gillmor’s phrasing borrows the language of markets and wraps it in the language of fairness, treating financial outcomes as something people are owed if the rules are tweaked the right way.
Contextually, Gillmor’s era in Congress was steeped in late-20th-century faith in privatization and investor logic, especially around retirement policy and public funds. The line reads like an argument for choice-based reforms (think partial privatization or expanded investment options) aimed at citizens framed less as protected beneficiaries and more as empowered consumers. It’s persuasion by understatement: no grand ideology, just "fairness" - a word that, in politics, often means "don’t look too closely at who takes on the risk."
Quote Details
| Topic | Investment |
|---|
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List









