"It doesn't worry me that people have criticised the building"
About this Quote
Bravado and discipline sit side by side in Seidler's shrug at criticism. For an architect, public dislike isn’t just a bruised ego; it can mean planning delays, political blowback, and a building’s long-term reputation calcifying into “eyesore” shorthand. So the line reads less like indifference than a statement of method: he’s signaling that controversy is an expected cost of doing serious work in the public realm.
Seidler built in the aftershock of modernism’s arrival in Australia, when glass-and-concrete confidence was still being negotiated against older tastes, suburban sentimentality, and a press eager to treat new architecture as provocation. In that context, “it doesn’t worry me” is a refusal to let consensus become the design brief. He’s implicitly separating critique into two categories: aesthetic panic (which he can ignore) and technical or ethical failure (which he can’t). The sentence’s spare construction matters, too. No defense, no elaboration, no pleading for understanding. That restraint performs the very modernist virtue Seidler championed: clarity over ornament, conviction over charm.
The subtext is also a quiet rebuke to the idea that buildings should aim to be liked immediately. Architecture, unlike a painting, can’t retreat into a gallery; it forces itself into daily life, where first reactions are often conservative because the stakes feel personal. Seidler bets on time, on use, on the eventual normalization of the new. Criticism, in this view, is not a verdict; it’s a symptom that something has actually changed.
Seidler built in the aftershock of modernism’s arrival in Australia, when glass-and-concrete confidence was still being negotiated against older tastes, suburban sentimentality, and a press eager to treat new architecture as provocation. In that context, “it doesn’t worry me” is a refusal to let consensus become the design brief. He’s implicitly separating critique into two categories: aesthetic panic (which he can ignore) and technical or ethical failure (which he can’t). The sentence’s spare construction matters, too. No defense, no elaboration, no pleading for understanding. That restraint performs the very modernist virtue Seidler championed: clarity over ornament, conviction over charm.
The subtext is also a quiet rebuke to the idea that buildings should aim to be liked immediately. Architecture, unlike a painting, can’t retreat into a gallery; it forces itself into daily life, where first reactions are often conservative because the stakes feel personal. Seidler bets on time, on use, on the eventual normalization of the new. Criticism, in this view, is not a verdict; it’s a symptom that something has actually changed.
Quote Details
| Topic | Confidence |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Harry
Add to List


