"It has always been my belief that a man should do his best, regardless of how much he receives for his services, or the number of people he may be serving or the class of people served"
About this Quote
Meritocracy gets sold here as a moral posture: do your best even when the pay is low, the audience is small, or the people you serve don’t carry prestige. Hill frames excellence as self-contained, a kind of internal contract that shouldn’t fluctuate with external rewards. The line’s rhythm is doing quiet work: “regardless” repeats the same refusal three different ways (money, scale, status), as if he’s sealing off every loophole the ego might use to justify mediocrity.
The intent is motivational, but the subtext is more complicated. Hill isn’t just praising craftsmanship; he’s policing resentment. If you’re underpaid or overlooked, the quote asks you to keep producing at the same standard, converting frustration into virtue. That’s admirable as personal discipline, and also socially useful: it encourages stability in systems where compensation and recognition often lag behind labor. In other words, it offers dignity, but it can also normalize exploitation by making under-reward a test of character rather than a problem to be solved.
Context matters. Hill’s career sits inside early-20th-century American self-help, an era obsessed with “character,” upward mobility, and the idea that attitude can outmuscle structure. Read that way, this is classic Hill: build a self-image of professionalism so consistent it becomes a magnet for future opportunity. He’s selling a portable ethic for a volatile marketplace - one that flatters the reader with agency while quietly shifting attention away from the inequities of who gets paid, praised, or served in the first place.
The intent is motivational, but the subtext is more complicated. Hill isn’t just praising craftsmanship; he’s policing resentment. If you’re underpaid or overlooked, the quote asks you to keep producing at the same standard, converting frustration into virtue. That’s admirable as personal discipline, and also socially useful: it encourages stability in systems where compensation and recognition often lag behind labor. In other words, it offers dignity, but it can also normalize exploitation by making under-reward a test of character rather than a problem to be solved.
Context matters. Hill’s career sits inside early-20th-century American self-help, an era obsessed with “character,” upward mobility, and the idea that attitude can outmuscle structure. Read that way, this is classic Hill: build a self-image of professionalism so consistent it becomes a magnet for future opportunity. He’s selling a portable ethic for a volatile marketplace - one that flatters the reader with agency while quietly shifting attention away from the inequities of who gets paid, praised, or served in the first place.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work Ethic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Napoleon
Add to List









