"It has become more acceptable to describe yourself as a conservative, but not everyone who uses that term about themselves really is truly conservative"
About this Quote
“Conservative” is treated here less as a philosophy than as contested property. Helms isn’t celebrating a broadened political tent; he’s policing a label. The first clause concedes a cultural shift: at some point in Helms’s career, saying you were conservative stopped sounding like an apology and started sounding like a credential. That’s not a neutral observation. It’s a setup for the second clause, which turns social acceptability into suspicion: when a brand becomes popular, opportunists and moderates will borrow it.
The subtext is gatekeeping with a purpose. Helms built a career in the hard-edged, post-civil rights realignment of the GOP, when “conservative” increasingly meant not only small government, but a combative stance on social order, race-coded politics, anti-communism, and cultural backlash. By implying that many self-described conservatives aren’t “truly” conservative, he draws an in-group boundary that favors his own faction: purists over pragmatists, cultural warriors over technocrats, movement loyalists over coalition-builders.
The line also carries an implicit warning to fellow Republicans: don’t confuse electoral marketing with ideological commitment. Helms’s “acceptable” reads like a dig at suburban respectability and donor-friendly conservatism - people who like the tax cuts but flinch at the fights. It’s a compact piece of rhetorical power because it sounds like humility (“not everyone…really is”) while functioning as a loyalty test. Whoever gets to define “truly conservative” gets to define the party.
The subtext is gatekeeping with a purpose. Helms built a career in the hard-edged, post-civil rights realignment of the GOP, when “conservative” increasingly meant not only small government, but a combative stance on social order, race-coded politics, anti-communism, and cultural backlash. By implying that many self-described conservatives aren’t “truly” conservative, he draws an in-group boundary that favors his own faction: purists over pragmatists, cultural warriors over technocrats, movement loyalists over coalition-builders.
The line also carries an implicit warning to fellow Republicans: don’t confuse electoral marketing with ideological commitment. Helms’s “acceptable” reads like a dig at suburban respectability and donor-friendly conservatism - people who like the tax cuts but flinch at the fights. It’s a compact piece of rhetorical power because it sounds like humility (“not everyone…really is”) while functioning as a loyalty test. Whoever gets to define “truly conservative” gets to define the party.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|
More Quotes by Jesse
Add to List






