"It has to be because unemployment problems in northwest Indiana are similar to those in southeast Chicago"
About this Quote
A sentence like this only looks clumsy if you ignore what it’s built to do: redraw a map of responsibility. Daley isn’t offering poetry; he’s offering jurisdiction. By pairing “northwest Indiana” with “southeast Chicago,” he’s insisting that a state line is irrelevant to an economic crisis that behaves like weather - drifting across borders, settling where industry has thinned out, unions have weakened, and municipal budgets are stretched. The repetition of directions (“northwest,” “southeast”) reads bureaucratic, but it’s strategic: it turns a political argument into a geographic inevitability.
The specific intent is coalition-making. Daley is justifying coordination - or funding, or regional planning - by describing unemployment as a shared condition rather than a local failure. It’s an appeal to the logic of the metro region, not the romance of the city: if the labor market is integrated, then policy should be, too. That “has to be” is the tell. It’s the language of constrained choice, a mayor signaling he’s not overreaching; he’s being forced by reality.
The subtext is also defensive. Chicago’s unemployment can’t be pinned solely on Chicago’s leadership if it mirrors problems next door. By invoking Indiana, Daley shifts the frame from city mismanagement to structural economic change - deindustrialization, commuting patterns, regional employers - problems too big for a single mayor to “fix” and therefore deserving of shared accountability (and shared resources).
The specific intent is coalition-making. Daley is justifying coordination - or funding, or regional planning - by describing unemployment as a shared condition rather than a local failure. It’s an appeal to the logic of the metro region, not the romance of the city: if the labor market is integrated, then policy should be, too. That “has to be” is the tell. It’s the language of constrained choice, a mayor signaling he’s not overreaching; he’s being forced by reality.
The subtext is also defensive. Chicago’s unemployment can’t be pinned solely on Chicago’s leadership if it mirrors problems next door. By invoking Indiana, Daley shifts the frame from city mismanagement to structural economic change - deindustrialization, commuting patterns, regional employers - problems too big for a single mayor to “fix” and therefore deserving of shared accountability (and shared resources).
Quote Details
| Topic | Work |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List

