"It is a very real concern and my view is that everything changed on September 11th and the procedure, the policies that were in place prior to September 11th no longer should apply"
About this Quote
Everything changed is the kind of sentence that tries to win an argument before it starts. Pataki is speaking in the compressed idiom of post-9/11 governance, where urgency becomes a moral credential and exception becomes a policy program. The line sounds pragmatic, even dutiful: a leader acknowledging a "very real concern". But its real work happens in the pivot from concern to permission. If September 11th is a civilizational rupture, then older rules are not merely outdated; they are suspect, naive, almost irresponsible.
The subtext is a redefinition of normal. Pataki treats pre-9/11 procedures and policies as artifacts of a softer era, implying that continuity itself is dangerous. That framing quietly moves the burden of proof. Instead of officials needing to justify new powers, critics now have to justify why the old constraints should survive a new world. Its a rhetorical fast lane to expanded discretion: faster decision-making, broader surveillance, longer detentions, looser standards - whatever the moment demands.
Context matters: as New York governor, Pataki spoke with proximity to trauma and with the credibility that comes from governing the symbolic ground zero state. That proximity can function as a shield against skepticism: questioning the policy shift can be painted as questioning the grief. The sentence also avoids specifics, which is strategic. By keeping the changes abstract, it invites broad assent while leaving the actual trade-offs - rights, oversight, error, abuse - to be negotiated later, often in the shadows.
Its effective because it packages a controversial idea (rules can be suspended) inside a widely shared feeling (the world is different).
The subtext is a redefinition of normal. Pataki treats pre-9/11 procedures and policies as artifacts of a softer era, implying that continuity itself is dangerous. That framing quietly moves the burden of proof. Instead of officials needing to justify new powers, critics now have to justify why the old constraints should survive a new world. Its a rhetorical fast lane to expanded discretion: faster decision-making, broader surveillance, longer detentions, looser standards - whatever the moment demands.
Context matters: as New York governor, Pataki spoke with proximity to trauma and with the credibility that comes from governing the symbolic ground zero state. That proximity can function as a shield against skepticism: questioning the policy shift can be painted as questioning the grief. The sentence also avoids specifics, which is strategic. By keeping the changes abstract, it invites broad assent while leaving the actual trade-offs - rights, oversight, error, abuse - to be negotiated later, often in the shadows.
Its effective because it packages a controversial idea (rules can be suspended) inside a widely shared feeling (the world is different).
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by George
Add to List


