"It is better to be able neither to read nor write than to be able to do nothing else"
About this Quote
Hazlitt is swinging at a particular kind of genteel uselessness: the person who can decode words beautifully yet can’t build, fix, judge, or live with any practical competence. The provocation lands because it flips literacy, usually treated as a moral badge, into something closer to a party trick. If reading and writing are all you’ve got, Hazlitt implies, they don’t elevate you; they expose you.
The line’s bite comes from its ruthless hierarchy of capacities. Illiteracy is cast not as a shame but as a limitation that can be offset by other forms of intelligence: craft, observation, physical skill, social judgment. Hazlitt, a critic by trade, is not romanticizing ignorance; he’s indicting a culture that confuses education with ability and credential with worth. It’s also a self-implicating jab. A professional writer warning that writing alone is inadequate carries the sting of confession, the kind of candor that gives his criticism its authority.
Context matters: early 19th-century Britain is industrializing, professionalizing, and expanding print culture. “Knowing letters” is becoming a key to status, yet the gap between salon accomplishment and material reality is widening. Hazlitt’s subtext is democratic and suspicious of polish: real competence is plural, embodied, tested against the world. The target isn’t the illiterate laborer; it’s the literate ornamental who mistakes fluency for substance.
The line’s bite comes from its ruthless hierarchy of capacities. Illiteracy is cast not as a shame but as a limitation that can be offset by other forms of intelligence: craft, observation, physical skill, social judgment. Hazlitt, a critic by trade, is not romanticizing ignorance; he’s indicting a culture that confuses education with ability and credential with worth. It’s also a self-implicating jab. A professional writer warning that writing alone is inadequate carries the sting of confession, the kind of candor that gives his criticism its authority.
Context matters: early 19th-century Britain is industrializing, professionalizing, and expanding print culture. “Knowing letters” is becoming a key to status, yet the gap between salon accomplishment and material reality is widening. Hazlitt’s subtext is democratic and suspicious of polish: real competence is plural, embodied, tested against the world. The target isn’t the illiterate laborer; it’s the literate ornamental who mistakes fluency for substance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work Ethic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by William
Add to List









