"It is better to discuss things, to argue and engage in polemics than make perfidious plans of mutual destruction"
About this Quote
Gorbachev frames talk not as a nicety but as a survival technology. The line sets up a blunt moral hierarchy: argument, even ugly argument, is preferable to the polished secrecy of “perfidious plans.” That adjective does heavy lifting. “Mutual destruction” could be presented as tragic inevitability; “perfidious” insists it’s chosen, engineered, and morally compromised. He’s not just advocating diplomacy. He’s indicting the bureaucratic seductions of the Cold War: the comfort of closed rooms, classified memos, and deterrence doctrines that treat annihilation as rational.
The phrasing also contains a quiet self-justification. Gorbachev’s political brand in the late 1980s was glasnost and the idea that openness could defuse an empire’s reflexes. Arguing and polemics were not obstacles to governance; they were the point, a pressure valve for a system that had long equated dissent with treason. By celebrating “polemics,” he normalizes conflict in public as healthier than conspiracy in private.
Context sharpens the edge: this is a leader who inherited an arms race and a Soviet state exhausted by it. His reforms, and the endgame of U.S.-Soviet nuclear brinkmanship, depended on persuading hardliners that dialogue wasn’t weakness. The subtext is a warning to every security establishment: when you demonize debate as division, you clear the runway for “mutual destruction” to masquerade as strategy.
The phrasing also contains a quiet self-justification. Gorbachev’s political brand in the late 1980s was glasnost and the idea that openness could defuse an empire’s reflexes. Arguing and polemics were not obstacles to governance; they were the point, a pressure valve for a system that had long equated dissent with treason. By celebrating “polemics,” he normalizes conflict in public as healthier than conspiracy in private.
Context sharpens the edge: this is a leader who inherited an arms race and a Soviet state exhausted by it. His reforms, and the endgame of U.S.-Soviet nuclear brinkmanship, depended on persuading hardliners that dialogue wasn’t weakness. The subtext is a warning to every security establishment: when you demonize debate as division, you clear the runway for “mutual destruction” to masquerade as strategy.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Mikhail
Add to List






