"It is clear from all these data that the interests of teenagers are not focused around studies, and that scholastic achievement is at most of minor importance in giving status or prestige to an adolescent in the eyes of other adolescents"
About this Quote
Coleman delivers the kind of empirically iced provocation social science does best: he doesn’t scold teenagers for not caring about school, he diagnoses a status economy in which school simply isn’t the main currency. The phrasing “clear from all these data” is doing rhetorical muscle work, pre-empting moral panic and adult anecdote with the authority of measurement. What follows is almost deliberately unromantic: “interests…not focused around studies.” Not “anti-intellectual,” not “lazy” - just oriented elsewhere. That calmness is the sting.
The subtext lands on adults, not kids. If scholastic achievement is only “of minor importance” for adolescent prestige, then exhortations about grades are doomed to be culturally outbid by whatever does earn status: athletic dominance, looks, charisma, rule-bending, belonging. Coleman is pointing at a peer society with its own logic, one that can neutralize institutional goals without anyone consciously “rebelling.” School becomes the stage, not the script.
Context matters: Coleman is writing in the mid-century era of big survey sociology and postwar faith in schooling as the engine of mobility (his research fed into the Coleman Report’s larger argument that schools alone can’t equalize outcomes). Read this way, the line is less a complaint about youth than a warning about incentives. Want achievement? Don’t just raise standards. Change what gets admired. Otherwise you’re asking a teenager to pay a social price for an adult ideal - and calling it motivation when they refuse.
The subtext lands on adults, not kids. If scholastic achievement is only “of minor importance” for adolescent prestige, then exhortations about grades are doomed to be culturally outbid by whatever does earn status: athletic dominance, looks, charisma, rule-bending, belonging. Coleman is pointing at a peer society with its own logic, one that can neutralize institutional goals without anyone consciously “rebelling.” School becomes the stage, not the script.
Context matters: Coleman is writing in the mid-century era of big survey sociology and postwar faith in schooling as the engine of mobility (his research fed into the Coleman Report’s larger argument that schools alone can’t equalize outcomes). Read this way, the line is less a complaint about youth than a warning about incentives. Want achievement? Don’t just raise standards. Change what gets admired. Otherwise you’re asking a teenager to pay a social price for an adult ideal - and calling it motivation when they refuse.
Quote Details
| Topic | Student |
|---|---|
| Source | James S. Coleman, The Adolescent Society: The Social Life of the Teenager and Its Impact on Education, 1961 (Coleman's study arguing adolescent status is tied more to peer interests than scholastic achievement). |
More Quotes by James
Add to List

