"It is equally demonstrable that so far as Texas is concerned, there have been equal confusion, insecurity and injustice in the administration of the State governments"
About this Quote
A politician reaches for the cold comfort of “demonstrable” when he wants his argument to sound less like a factional gripe and more like an indictment delivered with exhibits. William H. Wharton’s line is doing courtroom work: it frames Texas not as a place merely suffering growing pains, but as a jurisdiction whose rulers have forfeited legitimacy through “confusion, insecurity and injustice.” The triplet is calibrated. Confusion suggests incompetence, insecurity hints at the breakdown of basic protection, and injustice lands the moral blow. Put together, they move the complaint from policy failure to a breach of the social contract.
The phrase “so far as Texas is concerned” is also telling. It narrows the charge to a specific theater, inviting listeners to judge governance by lived conditions on the frontier rather than by distant constitutional theory. Wharton isn’t primarily litigating abstract rights; he’s building a pragmatic case that the existing state arrangement has produced a daily reality that cannot be defended. “Equally” does double duty: it implies the evidence is abundant and, more pointedly, that any opposing narrative is on equal footing only in the sense that it, too, can be disproven.
Context matters. In the 1830s, Texas was a pressure cooker of shifting authority, contested loyalties, and volatile relations with Mexico’s centralizing impulses. Wharton’s rhetoric turns that instability into political capital: if government yields insecurity, it has effectively resigned. The subtext is a permission slip for drastic change, packaged as sober diagnosis rather than rebellion.
The phrase “so far as Texas is concerned” is also telling. It narrows the charge to a specific theater, inviting listeners to judge governance by lived conditions on the frontier rather than by distant constitutional theory. Wharton isn’t primarily litigating abstract rights; he’s building a pragmatic case that the existing state arrangement has produced a daily reality that cannot be defended. “Equally” does double duty: it implies the evidence is abundant and, more pointedly, that any opposing narrative is on equal footing only in the sense that it, too, can be disproven.
Context matters. In the 1830s, Texas was a pressure cooker of shifting authority, contested loyalties, and volatile relations with Mexico’s centralizing impulses. Wharton’s rhetoric turns that instability into political capital: if government yields insecurity, it has effectively resigned. The subtext is a permission slip for drastic change, packaged as sober diagnosis rather than rebellion.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by William
Add to List
