"It is essential that policy instruments be developed that would firmly establish democratization on the basis of social consensus and enable transformation on stable grounds"
About this Quote
The line urges a move beyond slogans toward the design of concrete institutions that make democracy durable. Elections alone do not consolidate a democratic order; laws, procedures, and habits of negotiation must channel conflict and distribute power. Rooting change in social consensus signals that legitimacy comes from broad-based agreement across diverse social groups rather than from a narrow faction or a fleeting majority. Stability here does not mean stasis. It suggests a platform sturdy enough to support transformation without triggering backlash or institutional breakdown.
The context is Turkey’s long struggle with military tutelage, periodic coups, and deep ideological cleavages among secularists, Islamists, nationalists, Kurds, and liberals. Early in his tenure, Recep Tayyip Erdogan framed democratization as part of a modernization agenda aligned with EU accession. Policy packages limited the military’s role, expanded cultural rights, and reformed criminal and civil codes. These moves were presented as instruments to anchor civilian rule and to normalize politics. The emphasis on policy instruments fits a technocratic turn in post-crisis governance that privileges rules, regulatory agencies, and procedural safeguards.
Yet the language of consensus and stability cuts both ways. In polarized societies, consensus can slide into majoritarianism, where a large electoral win is treated as social consent. Stability can be invoked to curtail protest, restrict media, or centralize authority to manage change. Indeed, later developments in Turkey, including the 2010 judicial reforms, the state of emergency after the 2016 coup attempt, and the 2017 shift to an executive presidency, were justified as necessary for stability but criticized as narrowing pluralism.
The core insight remains sound: democratic consolidation requires institutions that encourage inclusive bargaining and protect minorities while enabling policy change. Whether such instruments deepen pluralism or entrench dominance depends on their design and on whether consensus is built through open deliberation and power-sharing or asserted after the fact through the language of stability.
The context is Turkey’s long struggle with military tutelage, periodic coups, and deep ideological cleavages among secularists, Islamists, nationalists, Kurds, and liberals. Early in his tenure, Recep Tayyip Erdogan framed democratization as part of a modernization agenda aligned with EU accession. Policy packages limited the military’s role, expanded cultural rights, and reformed criminal and civil codes. These moves were presented as instruments to anchor civilian rule and to normalize politics. The emphasis on policy instruments fits a technocratic turn in post-crisis governance that privileges rules, regulatory agencies, and procedural safeguards.
Yet the language of consensus and stability cuts both ways. In polarized societies, consensus can slide into majoritarianism, where a large electoral win is treated as social consent. Stability can be invoked to curtail protest, restrict media, or centralize authority to manage change. Indeed, later developments in Turkey, including the 2010 judicial reforms, the state of emergency after the 2016 coup attempt, and the 2017 shift to an executive presidency, were justified as necessary for stability but criticized as narrowing pluralism.
The core insight remains sound: democratic consolidation requires institutions that encourage inclusive bargaining and protect minorities while enabling policy change. Whether such instruments deepen pluralism or entrench dominance depends on their design and on whether consensus is built through open deliberation and power-sharing or asserted after the fact through the language of stability.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Recep
Add to List
