"It is for each of us freely to choose whom we shall serve, and find in that obedience our freedom"
About this Quote
Freedom doesn’t arrive as a blank check here; it arrives as a contract you sign on purpose. Mary Richards’s line recasts liberty as a disciplined act of allegiance: you “freely” choose a master, then discover that “obedience” is what makes you feel most yourself. It’s a paradox with teeth, the kind that pushes back on the modern fantasy that autonomy means never answering to anyone.
The intent is clarifying, almost pastoral: life will demand service anyway - to ego, to appetite, to money, to status, to ideology, to God, to family. The only real agency is selecting the thing you’ll let organize your days. That’s the subtext beneath “whom we shall serve”: a quiet warning that if you don’t choose deliberately, you’ll still be drafted.
“Find in that obedience our freedom” is the rhetorical pivot, and it works because it refuses the shallow opposition between freedom and constraint. Obedience, in this framing, isn’t humiliation; it’s alignment. The line suggests that commitment is not the end of choice but the condition that makes meaningful choice possible - like practicing scales so you can improvise, or accepting rules so a game can exist.
Contextually, it fits a moral tradition (religious, civic, even therapeutic) that treats identity as something forged through vows rather than vibes. In an era of infinite options and chronic self-curation, the quote reads less like submission and more like a dare: pick your devotion, then let it cost you something.
The intent is clarifying, almost pastoral: life will demand service anyway - to ego, to appetite, to money, to status, to ideology, to God, to family. The only real agency is selecting the thing you’ll let organize your days. That’s the subtext beneath “whom we shall serve”: a quiet warning that if you don’t choose deliberately, you’ll still be drafted.
“Find in that obedience our freedom” is the rhetorical pivot, and it works because it refuses the shallow opposition between freedom and constraint. Obedience, in this framing, isn’t humiliation; it’s alignment. The line suggests that commitment is not the end of choice but the condition that makes meaningful choice possible - like practicing scales so you can improvise, or accepting rules so a game can exist.
Contextually, it fits a moral tradition (religious, civic, even therapeutic) that treats identity as something forged through vows rather than vibes. In an era of infinite options and chronic self-curation, the quote reads less like submission and more like a dare: pick your devotion, then let it cost you something.
Quote Details
| Topic | Free Will & Fate |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Mary
Add to List









