"It is hard to know what you are talking about in mathematics, yet no one questions the validity of what you say. There is no other realm of discourse half so queer"
About this Quote
Mathematics gets away with murder, and Newman is pointing at the clean crime scene. The line flatters math as a kind of language that bypasses ordinary accountability: you can speak in symbols that feel opaque even to the speaker, yet the room nods along because the discipline’s authority is baked into the ritual. “Hard to know what you are talking about” isn’t just self-deprecation; it’s a jab at how mathematical talk can drift away from intuition and still retain its badge of legitimacy.
The subtext is social as much as philosophical. In everyday argument, ignorance is punishable. In math, ignorance can masquerade as sophistication because the audience has been trained to treat formalism as a seal of truth. Newman’s “no one questions the validity” lands like a critique of deference: we don’t merely trust proofs, we trust the performance of proof-like speech. That’s why “queer” matters here in its older sense - strange, uncanny. Mathematics is the rare discourse where meaning can be slippery while correctness remains rigid, where you may not “understand” a statement in any human way but can still accept it because the rules say so.
The context cues a mid-century fascination with technical expertise: rockets, computers, the priesthood of STEM. Casting this observation in an astronaut’s voice (even if biographically odd) sharpens the cultural point. Modern life runs on systems most of us can’t parse, and math is the purest version: a domain where authority often outruns comprehension, and that gap is treated not as a problem, but as proof of profundity.
The subtext is social as much as philosophical. In everyday argument, ignorance is punishable. In math, ignorance can masquerade as sophistication because the audience has been trained to treat formalism as a seal of truth. Newman’s “no one questions the validity” lands like a critique of deference: we don’t merely trust proofs, we trust the performance of proof-like speech. That’s why “queer” matters here in its older sense - strange, uncanny. Mathematics is the rare discourse where meaning can be slippery while correctness remains rigid, where you may not “understand” a statement in any human way but can still accept it because the rules say so.
The context cues a mid-century fascination with technical expertise: rockets, computers, the priesthood of STEM. Casting this observation in an astronaut’s voice (even if biographically odd) sharpens the cultural point. Modern life runs on systems most of us can’t parse, and math is the purest version: a domain where authority often outruns comprehension, and that gap is treated not as a problem, but as proof of profundity.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by James
Add to List
