"It is important to know who killed Jack Kennedy and why"
About this Quote
The line lands like a civic demand disguised as a simple sentence: “important,” “know,” “who,” “why.” Jim Garrison isn’t trading in grief; he’s asserting a public right. That choice matters. By naming “Jack Kennedy” in the familiar, almost intimate register, he invokes not just a president but a national character we still feel we lost. Then he pivots to the most combustible verbs in American political life: “killed” and “know.” The subtext is accusation without an accused, a rhetorical vacuum that invites the listener to fill it with institutions - the CIA, the mafia, anti-Castro operatives, Texas oil, the Pentagon - depending on which version of American power they already distrust.
Context sharpens the intent. As the New Orleans district attorney who pursued a conspiracy case tied to JFK’s assassination, Garrison stood in open conflict with the Warren Commission’s lone-gunman conclusion. His insistence on “why” is the tell: lone wolves don’t need motives that scale to history. “Why” implies a political architecture, a logic of statecraft, a reason big enough to justify the risk of murdering a head of state. It’s also a shrewd move, because motives can’t be ballistically disproved.
The sentence works because it’s both procedural and mythic. It frames the assassination as an unresolved case file, not a closed chapter, while quietly suggesting that the republic can’t trust itself until the story makes moral sense. In Garrison’s mouth, “important” isn’t academic. It’s a warning that democracy can’t survive permanent ambiguity about who holds real power.
Context sharpens the intent. As the New Orleans district attorney who pursued a conspiracy case tied to JFK’s assassination, Garrison stood in open conflict with the Warren Commission’s lone-gunman conclusion. His insistence on “why” is the tell: lone wolves don’t need motives that scale to history. “Why” implies a political architecture, a logic of statecraft, a reason big enough to justify the risk of murdering a head of state. It’s also a shrewd move, because motives can’t be ballistically disproved.
The sentence works because it’s both procedural and mythic. It frames the assassination as an unresolved case file, not a closed chapter, while quietly suggesting that the republic can’t trust itself until the story makes moral sense. In Garrison’s mouth, “important” isn’t academic. It’s a warning that democracy can’t survive permanent ambiguity about who holds real power.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Jim
Add to List





