"It is impossible to predict the time and progress of revolution. It is governed by its own more or less mysterious laws"
About this Quote
Lenin’s line is a tactical shrug dressed up as historical insight: revolutions can’t be timed, can’t be staged like a parade, and anyone claiming otherwise is selling you a script. Coming from a man obsessed with organization, discipline, and seizing the “right moment,” the admission lands with a useful tension. He’s not abandoning strategy; he’s warning that strategy has to ride a force that won’t fully obey it.
The phrase “more or less mysterious laws” does two things at once. It borrows the authority of science - laws, not vibes - while conceding that the variables remain opaque to even the most confident theorist. That ambiguity is the point. It immunizes the movement against embarrassment: if the uprising stalls, fragments, or turns unexpectedly violent, that isn’t failure of leadership or doctrine; it’s the revolution’s nature. The claim shifts responsibility from planners to history itself, a move that steadies followers and disarms critics.
Context matters: Lenin operated in an empire cracking under war, hunger, and political incompetence, where sudden collapses and rapid power grabs were less anomaly than pattern. In that environment, forecasting becomes both a political weapon and a liability. To predict is to promise; to promise is to be judged.
So the subtext is a hard-edged form of opportunism: keep your ideology ready, your apparatus flexible, and your moral alibi prepared. If revolution has “laws,” then taking power can be framed not as choice, but as compliance with history’s demands.
The phrase “more or less mysterious laws” does two things at once. It borrows the authority of science - laws, not vibes - while conceding that the variables remain opaque to even the most confident theorist. That ambiguity is the point. It immunizes the movement against embarrassment: if the uprising stalls, fragments, or turns unexpectedly violent, that isn’t failure of leadership or doctrine; it’s the revolution’s nature. The claim shifts responsibility from planners to history itself, a move that steadies followers and disarms critics.
Context matters: Lenin operated in an empire cracking under war, hunger, and political incompetence, where sudden collapses and rapid power grabs were less anomaly than pattern. In that environment, forecasting becomes both a political weapon and a liability. To predict is to promise; to promise is to be judged.
So the subtext is a hard-edged form of opportunism: keep your ideology ready, your apparatus flexible, and your moral alibi prepared. If revolution has “laws,” then taking power can be framed not as choice, but as compliance with history’s demands.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Vladimir
Add to List
