"It is not a sign of arrogance for the king to rule. That is what he is there for"
About this Quote
The subtext is classic Buckley: a patrician skepticism toward modern egalitarian guilt, dressed up as common sense. He’s not defending tyranny so much as defending the idea that authority can be proper without constantly apologizing for itself. In that frame, calling rule “arrogant” becomes a category error, like blaming a judge for judging. The line also smuggles in an old conservative instinct: order isn’t self-generating; it requires someone authorized to say no, to rank, to decide.
Context matters. Buckley spent a career needling liberal pieties and re-legitimizing the language of tradition, competence, and “natural” leadership for postwar America. He knew that modern audiences flinch at crowns, so he uses “king” as a high-contrast metaphor: if even monarchy can be described as mere duty, then lesser forms of authority - elites, institutions, gatekeepers - can be recast as necessary rather than suspect. The sting is its calmness. It doesn’t beg you to love kings; it asks you to stop acting surprised they act like kings.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Jr., William F. Buckley,. (2026, January 15). It is not a sign of arrogance for the king to rule. That is what he is there for. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/it-is-not-a-sign-of-arrogance-for-the-king-to-2402/
Chicago Style
Jr., William F. Buckley,. "It is not a sign of arrogance for the king to rule. That is what he is there for." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/it-is-not-a-sign-of-arrogance-for-the-king-to-2402/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"It is not a sign of arrogance for the king to rule. That is what he is there for." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/it-is-not-a-sign-of-arrogance-for-the-king-to-2402/. Accessed 18 Feb. 2026.












