"It is not about Republicanism, it's about conservatism"
About this Quote
“It is not about Republicanism, it’s about conservatism” is a neat act of political boundary-drawing disguised as clarification. Mark Davis isn’t merely swapping labels; he’s shifting the frame from party identity (a team jersey) to an ideology (a worldview), and that move carries a quiet accusation: you’re misreading the stakes if you’re treating this as just partisan theater.
The line works because “Republicanism” can be made to sound procedural and contingent - an electoral vehicle, a coalition, a branding exercise. “Conservatism,” by contrast, signals continuity, moral seriousness, and a longer historical arc. Davis is telling the listener: stop focusing on who’s driving the bus; pay attention to where the route is headed. It’s a way to legitimate certain positions as rooted in principle rather than in party loyalty, even when those positions happen to align with a party’s immediate incentives.
The subtext also cuts in the other direction: it implicitly disowns “Republicanism” as insufficiently coherent or trustworthy. In an era when party platforms lurch with news cycles and personalities, insisting “it’s about conservatism” can be a bid to reclaim an older identity, one that feels more stable than a GOP that may be associated with populism, Trumpism, or internal factional chaos.
Context matters: the sentence is usually deployed when someone wants to explain voting patterns, policy fights, or media narratives without granting the opposition an easy “partisans gonna partisan” dismissal. It’s an attempt to raise the argument above the level of party, while still playing on the same battlefield.
The line works because “Republicanism” can be made to sound procedural and contingent - an electoral vehicle, a coalition, a branding exercise. “Conservatism,” by contrast, signals continuity, moral seriousness, and a longer historical arc. Davis is telling the listener: stop focusing on who’s driving the bus; pay attention to where the route is headed. It’s a way to legitimate certain positions as rooted in principle rather than in party loyalty, even when those positions happen to align with a party’s immediate incentives.
The subtext also cuts in the other direction: it implicitly disowns “Republicanism” as insufficiently coherent or trustworthy. In an era when party platforms lurch with news cycles and personalities, insisting “it’s about conservatism” can be a bid to reclaim an older identity, one that feels more stable than a GOP that may be associated with populism, Trumpism, or internal factional chaos.
Context matters: the sentence is usually deployed when someone wants to explain voting patterns, policy fights, or media narratives without granting the opposition an easy “partisans gonna partisan” dismissal. It’s an attempt to raise the argument above the level of party, while still playing on the same battlefield.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Mark
Add to List
