"It is not contrary to reason to prefer the destruction of the whole world to the scratching of my finger"
About this Quote
The subtext is a demolition job on the idea that ethics can be derived from pure thought. Hume is setting up his famous point that passions and sentiments move us, while reason merely serves: it informs us what’s true, what causes what, what will happen if we choose X. It doesn’t tell us what to care about. That’s why the “scratching of my finger” matters: it’s petty, bodily, immediate. By placing it against “the whole world,” he dramatizes how a preference can be both coherent and monstrous, and how moral outrage is not a logical refutation.
Contextually, this is Enlightenment skepticism deployed against Enlightenment confidence. In an era hungry for rational foundations - for politics, science, religion, morality - Hume insists that the engine underneath is not reason’s purity but human psychology. The sting of the quote is diagnostic: if your ethics depends on reason alone, it’s defenseless against the person who simply doesn’t care.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Hume, David. (2026, January 16). It is not contrary to reason to prefer the destruction of the whole world to the scratching of my finger. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/it-is-not-contrary-to-reason-to-prefer-the-86686/
Chicago Style
Hume, David. "It is not contrary to reason to prefer the destruction of the whole world to the scratching of my finger." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/it-is-not-contrary-to-reason-to-prefer-the-86686/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"It is not contrary to reason to prefer the destruction of the whole world to the scratching of my finger." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/it-is-not-contrary-to-reason-to-prefer-the-86686/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.









