"It is not possible to make great buildings, or great towns, beautiful places, places where you feel yourself, places where you feel alive, except by following this way. And, as you will see, this way will lead anyone who looks for it to buildings which are themselves as ancient in their form, as the trees and hills, and as our faces are"
About this Quote
Alexander’s provocation is that beauty in the built world isn’t a styling problem; it’s a life problem. “Great buildings” and “great towns” fail, he implies, when they’re conceived as objects to be admired rather than places to inhabit. The repetition of “places” does quiet polemical work: he drags architecture out of the magazine spread and back into the body, into the felt sense of being “alive.” That’s the real standard he’s setting, and it’s uncompromisingly human.
The phrase “following this way” carries the subtext of a method that isn’t merely technical. Alexander is arguing for a discipline of attention: to patterns of use, to incremental growth, to the small feedback loops that let a street or a courtyard settle into rightness. In the background is his long campaign against top-down modernism and its appetite for novelty as a virtue in itself. He’s not nostalgic for old styles; he’s suspicious of design that treats tradition as optional, as if form can be invented from scratch without consequences.
His most radical move is the time-scale shift. By likening good buildings to “trees and hills” and “our faces,” he frames architecture as something that should look inevitable, weathered into coherence by generations of need and adaptation. “Ancient” here doesn’t mean antique; it means rooted, shaped by forces deeper than taste: climate, craft, walking speeds, social rituals, thresholds. The intent is almost moral: if a place doesn’t let you feel yourself, it isn’t merely ugly - it’s failing at what a town is for.
The phrase “following this way” carries the subtext of a method that isn’t merely technical. Alexander is arguing for a discipline of attention: to patterns of use, to incremental growth, to the small feedback loops that let a street or a courtyard settle into rightness. In the background is his long campaign against top-down modernism and its appetite for novelty as a virtue in itself. He’s not nostalgic for old styles; he’s suspicious of design that treats tradition as optional, as if form can be invented from scratch without consequences.
His most radical move is the time-scale shift. By likening good buildings to “trees and hills” and “our faces,” he frames architecture as something that should look inevitable, weathered into coherence by generations of need and adaptation. “Ancient” here doesn’t mean antique; it means rooted, shaped by forces deeper than taste: climate, craft, walking speeds, social rituals, thresholds. The intent is almost moral: if a place doesn’t let you feel yourself, it isn’t merely ugly - it’s failing at what a town is for.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Christopher Alexander — The Timeless Way of Building, 1979, Oxford University Press (opening chapters). |
More Quotes by Christopher
Add to List
