"It is obvious that different individuals require different things to live good, healthy, and virtuous lives"
About this Quote
Palmer’s line reads like a calm observation, but it’s really a quiet landmine under one-size-fits-all moralizing. By starting with “It is obvious,” he’s doing more than stating a premise; he’s preemptively boxing out the counterargument that society can be engineered around a single blueprint for human flourishing. “Different individuals require different things” is the sentence’s engine, smuggling pluralism into what sounds like common sense.
The choice to bundle “good, healthy, and virtuous” is strategic. “Healthy” invokes the language of bodies, medicine, and measurable wellbeing; “virtuous” invokes the moral register; “good” sits as the broad, almost undefinable umbrella. Put together, the phrase challenges any authority that claims unique access to the recipe for the whole person. If you can’t standardize what “virtue” demands, you definitely can’t standardize the policies meant to produce it.
The subtext is liberal in the older sense: a defense of individual autonomy against paternalism. Palmer isn’t arguing that values don’t matter; he’s arguing that values have to be lived through particular lives, with particular constraints, temperaments, histories, and aspirations. The contextual target is the perennial urge of institutions - governments, schools, even well-meaning cultural movements - to treat citizens like interchangeable parts. The line works because it sounds noncontroversial while pointing toward a controversial conclusion: a just society makes room for difference rather than forcing a single model of “the virtuous life” onto everyone.
The choice to bundle “good, healthy, and virtuous” is strategic. “Healthy” invokes the language of bodies, medicine, and measurable wellbeing; “virtuous” invokes the moral register; “good” sits as the broad, almost undefinable umbrella. Put together, the phrase challenges any authority that claims unique access to the recipe for the whole person. If you can’t standardize what “virtue” demands, you definitely can’t standardize the policies meant to produce it.
The subtext is liberal in the older sense: a defense of individual autonomy against paternalism. Palmer isn’t arguing that values don’t matter; he’s arguing that values have to be lived through particular lives, with particular constraints, temperaments, histories, and aspirations. The contextual target is the perennial urge of institutions - governments, schools, even well-meaning cultural movements - to treat citizens like interchangeable parts. The line works because it sounds noncontroversial while pointing toward a controversial conclusion: a just society makes room for difference rather than forcing a single model of “the virtuous life” onto everyone.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List








