"It is only at the first encounter that a face makes its full impression on us"
About this Quote
Schopenhauer’s line has the clean chill of a diagnosis: what feels like “getting to know” a person is, at first, a sensory event that hardens into belief. The “full impression” isn’t necessarily the truest one; it’s the most complete in its power over us, precisely because it arrives before analysis and before habit dulls perception. He’s pointing at a psychological trap with metaphysical implications: once the mind files a face, it stops really seeing it. Recognition becomes a kind of blindness.
The intent is quietly polemical. Schopenhauer is skeptical of human rationality and even more skeptical of our moral narratives about it. By making the first encounter decisive, he undercuts the flattering idea that we revise our judgments as we learn more. We don’t; we decorate them. Later encounters add biographical details, but the face has already been turned into a symbol: trustworthy, ridiculous, threatening, desirable. That’s the subtext: physiognomy without the pseudo-science, a frank admission that we read character into features and then defend the reading as insight.
Context matters here. Schopenhauer writes in a Europe newly obsessed with subjectivity, where Romantic notions of the “inner self” coexist with rising interest in classification: types, temperaments, criminal faces. His aphorism sits at that crossroads, wary of sentimentality and wary of progress. It also anticipates a modern media truth: in an image-saturated world, first impressions don’t just happen quickly; they become sticky, algorithmic. The face hits once, and the mind spends the rest of the time rationalizing the hit.
The intent is quietly polemical. Schopenhauer is skeptical of human rationality and even more skeptical of our moral narratives about it. By making the first encounter decisive, he undercuts the flattering idea that we revise our judgments as we learn more. We don’t; we decorate them. Later encounters add biographical details, but the face has already been turned into a symbol: trustworthy, ridiculous, threatening, desirable. That’s the subtext: physiognomy without the pseudo-science, a frank admission that we read character into features and then defend the reading as insight.
Context matters here. Schopenhauer writes in a Europe newly obsessed with subjectivity, where Romantic notions of the “inner self” coexist with rising interest in classification: types, temperaments, criminal faces. His aphorism sits at that crossroads, wary of sentimentality and wary of progress. It also anticipates a modern media truth: in an image-saturated world, first impressions don’t just happen quickly; they become sticky, algorithmic. The face hits once, and the mind spends the rest of the time rationalizing the hit.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List







