"It is only reasonable that our laws do not force our country to provide safe harbor to those individuals that are being sought out by their governments due to their terrorist ties"
About this Quote
Reasonable is doing a lot of work here. Shuster’s line isn’t just an argument for a policy; it’s a preemptive framing device meant to make dissent sound irrational, even indulgent. By opening with “It is only reasonable,” he smuggles a contested judgment into the realm of common sense, as if the hard questions around asylum, evidence, and due process are already settled. The sentence then narrows the moral lens: not “refugees” or “asylum seekers,” but “those individuals” with “terrorist ties,” a phrase elastic enough to cover everyone from actual militants to people accused by authoritarian regimes eager to label opponents as terrorists.
The subtext is a familiar post-9/11 move in American politics: conflate immigration relief with national vulnerability, then treat restraint as negligence. “Safe harbor” borrows the language of shelter and complicity, implying that granting protection is tantamount to aiding an enemy. The kicker is “being sought out by their governments,” which quietly recasts foreign states as legitimate arbiters of guilt. That’s the rhetorical sleight of hand: it collapses the crucial distinction between being accused and being proven dangerous, and between democratic allies and regimes that use terrorism allegations as a dragnet.
Contextually, this reads like congressional-era security messaging shaped by the War on Terror and periodic spikes in fear around refugee flows. Its intent isn’t to litigate individual cases; it’s to build political permission for tighter asylum rules by making humanitarian discretion sound like a loophole terrorists exploit.
The subtext is a familiar post-9/11 move in American politics: conflate immigration relief with national vulnerability, then treat restraint as negligence. “Safe harbor” borrows the language of shelter and complicity, implying that granting protection is tantamount to aiding an enemy. The kicker is “being sought out by their governments,” which quietly recasts foreign states as legitimate arbiters of guilt. That’s the rhetorical sleight of hand: it collapses the crucial distinction between being accused and being proven dangerous, and between democratic allies and regimes that use terrorism allegations as a dragnet.
Contextually, this reads like congressional-era security messaging shaped by the War on Terror and periodic spikes in fear around refugee flows. Its intent isn’t to litigate individual cases; it’s to build political permission for tighter asylum rules by making humanitarian discretion sound like a loophole terrorists exploit.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Bill
Add to List



