"It is possible to be different and still be all right. There can be two - or more - answers to the same question, and all can be right"
About this Quote
The line reads like a gentle corrective to a culture that treats disagreement as a moral failure. Anne Wilson Schaef isn’t selling difference as edgy individualism; she’s offering difference as survival skill. Coming out of a late-20th-century self-help and recovery milieu, her work often circles the ways families, institutions, and addictions enforce a single “right” way to feel, decide, or be. In that context, “all right” is the tell: it’s not “superior” or even “correct,” just safe, acceptable, allowed.
The quote works by shifting the stakes from epistemology to belonging. “Two - or more - answers” isn’t only about factual questions; it’s about the daily interrogations people face: How do you grieve? How do you love? What does “success” look like? By framing plurality as normal, Schaef quietly attacks the binary logic that props up shame: if you’re not like us, you’re wrong; if you’re wrong, you’re unworthy. Her phrasing refuses that chain reaction.
There’s also a subtle boundary-setting embedded here. Saying multiple answers can be right doesn’t mean every claim is equally true in every domain; it’s an argument against coercive certainty, not against reality. The emphasis lands on relational life, where “rightness” is often code for control. Schaef’s intent is permission-giving, but the subtext is sharper: communities that can’t tolerate multiple right answers are communities built to punish deviation.
The quote works by shifting the stakes from epistemology to belonging. “Two - or more - answers” isn’t only about factual questions; it’s about the daily interrogations people face: How do you grieve? How do you love? What does “success” look like? By framing plurality as normal, Schaef quietly attacks the binary logic that props up shame: if you’re not like us, you’re wrong; if you’re wrong, you’re unworthy. Her phrasing refuses that chain reaction.
There’s also a subtle boundary-setting embedded here. Saying multiple answers can be right doesn’t mean every claim is equally true in every domain; it’s an argument against coercive certainty, not against reality. The emphasis lands on relational life, where “rightness” is often code for control. Schaef’s intent is permission-giving, but the subtext is sharper: communities that can’t tolerate multiple right answers are communities built to punish deviation.
Quote Details
| Topic | Respect |
|---|
More Quotes by Anne
Add to List





