"It is the logic of consumerism that undermines the values of loyalty and permanence and promotes a different set of values that is destructive of family life"
About this Quote
Lasch isn’t fretting about shopping habits; he’s indicting a whole moral operating system. By calling it the “logic of consumerism,” he treats consumer culture less like a personal vice than a structure with its own cold rules: desire must be kept restless, attachments must stay provisional, identity must remain up for revision. That word “logic” matters. It implies that even well-meaning people can’t simply opt out, because the system rewards the temporary and penalizes the durable.
The phrase “undermines the values of loyalty and permanence” is deliberately old-fashioned, almost matrimonial in tone, and that’s the point. Lasch frames loyalty and permanence not as sentimental preferences but as cultural infrastructure: the commitments that make family life more than a set of roommates rotating through obligations. Consumerism, in his view, trains us to treat everything as replaceable and customizable. When the dominant story is that satisfaction is always one upgrade away, patience starts to look like failure and staying starts to look like settling.
His subtext is sharper than nostalgia. He’s arguing that market rationality spreads beyond the mall and into the self: partners become “fit,” children become “projects,” homes become “investments,” relationships become “choices” constantly audited for return. “Promotes a different set of values” hints at an ethical swap: from duty to preference, from interdependence to self-optimization.
Contextually, Lasch wrote amid postwar affluence, rising divorce rates, and the expanding reach of advertising and corporate life into the private sphere. The anxiety isn’t simply that families change; it’s that a culture organized around perpetual wanting makes long-term commitment feel irrational, even as it depends on stable households to do the unpaid work of care.
The phrase “undermines the values of loyalty and permanence” is deliberately old-fashioned, almost matrimonial in tone, and that’s the point. Lasch frames loyalty and permanence not as sentimental preferences but as cultural infrastructure: the commitments that make family life more than a set of roommates rotating through obligations. Consumerism, in his view, trains us to treat everything as replaceable and customizable. When the dominant story is that satisfaction is always one upgrade away, patience starts to look like failure and staying starts to look like settling.
His subtext is sharper than nostalgia. He’s arguing that market rationality spreads beyond the mall and into the self: partners become “fit,” children become “projects,” homes become “investments,” relationships become “choices” constantly audited for return. “Promotes a different set of values” hints at an ethical swap: from duty to preference, from interdependence to self-optimization.
Contextually, Lasch wrote amid postwar affluence, rising divorce rates, and the expanding reach of advertising and corporate life into the private sphere. The anxiety isn’t simply that families change; it’s that a culture organized around perpetual wanting makes long-term commitment feel irrational, even as it depends on stable households to do the unpaid work of care.
Quote Details
| Topic | Family |
|---|
More Quotes by Christopher
Add to List





