"It is time to effect a revolution in female manners - time to restore to them their lost dignity. It is time to separate unchangeable morals from local manners"
About this Quote
Wollstonecraft isn’t asking women to lean in; she’s calling for an overhaul of the social operating system that keeps them small. “Revolution” is the tell: this is Enlightenment language with teeth, a deliberate theft of a word usually reserved for states and armies. She aims it at “female manners” because manners were never just etiquette; they were governance by other means, a daily training regimen in deference that made inequality feel like taste.
The phrase “restore to them their lost dignity” does sly double work. It implies women possess dignity by right, not by permission, and that something has been taken from them - by education, by custom, by a culture that rewards ornamental weakness as feminine virtue. “Lost” also flatters the reader’s moral imagination: dignity is not a radical new demand but a recovery mission, a return to what should have been obvious all along.
Her sharpest move is the distinction between “unchangeable morals” and “local manners.” That’s an argument against the convenient confusion that props up patriarchy: treating contingent social rules as if they were eternal truths. If modesty, delicacy, and submissiveness are merely “local,” then they can be revised without threatening morality itself. She’s clearing philosophical space for reform by insisting that ethics is not the same thing as tradition.
Context matters: writing in the wake of revolutionary upheaval, Wollstonecraft targets the hypocrisy of a rights-obsessed age that still expects women to perform obedience as a kind of beauty. The subtext is political: change how women are trained to behave, and you change what society thinks women are for.
The phrase “restore to them their lost dignity” does sly double work. It implies women possess dignity by right, not by permission, and that something has been taken from them - by education, by custom, by a culture that rewards ornamental weakness as feminine virtue. “Lost” also flatters the reader’s moral imagination: dignity is not a radical new demand but a recovery mission, a return to what should have been obvious all along.
Her sharpest move is the distinction between “unchangeable morals” and “local manners.” That’s an argument against the convenient confusion that props up patriarchy: treating contingent social rules as if they were eternal truths. If modesty, delicacy, and submissiveness are merely “local,” then they can be revised without threatening morality itself. She’s clearing philosophical space for reform by insisting that ethics is not the same thing as tradition.
Context matters: writing in the wake of revolutionary upheaval, Wollstonecraft targets the hypocrisy of a rights-obsessed age that still expects women to perform obedience as a kind of beauty. The subtext is political: change how women are trained to behave, and you change what society thinks women are for.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Mary
Add to List










