"It is vitally important that we implement immigration reform. We need a bill that strengthens our borders and protects this nation, but that also makes it simpler for good people to become Americans"
About this Quote
Dave Reichert frames immigration as both a security imperative and a moral, practical commitment to renewal. The language balances two poles often set against each other: stronger borders to protect the nation and a clearer, more humane path for people who want to join it. The pairing is deliberate. It answers fears about lawlessness and safety while acknowledging that the current system’s complexity and delays push otherwise law-abiding people into the shadows and deprive the economy and communities of needed talent.
As a former sheriff and a Republican from a swing district in Washington state, Reichert’s stance reflects a law-and-order sensibility tempered by pragmatism. His background lends weight to the call for enforcement, but he also recognizes that order is unsustainable without workable legal channels. When legal immigration is clogged by backlogs, arbitrary quotas, and red tape, unauthorized migration becomes more likely, exploitation worsens, and public trust erodes. Simplifying legal paths can reduce pressure on the border, align flows with labor market needs, and clarify who qualifies to stay.
The phrase “good people” signals a moral filter: those who contribute, obey the law, and seek to integrate. It also leaves open a hard policy question: how to define and vet “good,” and how to weigh family ties, skills, and humanitarian claims. That ambiguity mirrors the national debate, where comprehensive reform has repeatedly stalled between demands for fencing, surveillance, and enforcement, and proposals for legalization or earned citizenship for long-settled residents, including Dreamers.
Reichert’s formulation invokes a classic American narrative: the nation of laws that is also a nation of immigrants. The political wager is that a durable settlement requires both halves. Secure borders build legitimacy; humane, predictable rules express national confidence and economic common sense. In a state whose economy spans orchards to tech campuses, the appeal is concrete: safety, fairness, and growth depend on rules that are tough where necessary and welcoming where wise.
As a former sheriff and a Republican from a swing district in Washington state, Reichert’s stance reflects a law-and-order sensibility tempered by pragmatism. His background lends weight to the call for enforcement, but he also recognizes that order is unsustainable without workable legal channels. When legal immigration is clogged by backlogs, arbitrary quotas, and red tape, unauthorized migration becomes more likely, exploitation worsens, and public trust erodes. Simplifying legal paths can reduce pressure on the border, align flows with labor market needs, and clarify who qualifies to stay.
The phrase “good people” signals a moral filter: those who contribute, obey the law, and seek to integrate. It also leaves open a hard policy question: how to define and vet “good,” and how to weigh family ties, skills, and humanitarian claims. That ambiguity mirrors the national debate, where comprehensive reform has repeatedly stalled between demands for fencing, surveillance, and enforcement, and proposals for legalization or earned citizenship for long-settled residents, including Dreamers.
Reichert’s formulation invokes a classic American narrative: the nation of laws that is also a nation of immigrants. The political wager is that a durable settlement requires both halves. Secure borders build legitimacy; humane, predictable rules express national confidence and economic common sense. In a state whose economy spans orchards to tech campuses, the appeal is concrete: safety, fairness, and growth depend on rules that are tough where necessary and welcoming where wise.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Dave
Add to List
