"It is with children that we have the best chance of studying the development of logical knowledge, mathematical knowledge, physical knowledge, and so forth"
About this Quote
Piaget’s line flatters children by turning them into a laboratory, but it also quietly demotes adulthood from “finished product” to “fossil record.” If you want to understand how logic and math actually come online in the mind, he’s arguing, don’t interrogate polished adult answers; watch the messy, error-filled process of becoming capable of them. The intent is methodological: children aren’t interesting because they’re innocent, but because they’re unfinished in ways that make thinking visible.
The subtext is a rebuke to common-sense psychology. Adults can explain a syllogism, recite multiplication tables, even sound rational while running on habit and cultural scripts. Kids, by contrast, externalize the glitches. They reveal the mind’s “beta versions”: conservation tasks where quantity looks like it changes when a glass gets taller; counting that confuses order with magnitude; causal explanations that treat the world as animated and purposeful. Those mistakes aren’t noise to Piaget; they’re data, showing what kinds of structures must be built before “logical knowledge” feels effortless.
Context matters. Piaget is writing in a 20th-century moment when psychology is trying to earn its scientific stripes and when schooling is often treated as mere content delivery. His claim implies something more disruptive: knowledge isn’t poured in, it’s constructed through stages of interaction with the world. Studying children becomes a way to map the architecture of thought itself, and a subtle political argument about education: if development has a sequence, teaching that ignores it isn’t rigorous, it’s wishful.
The subtext is a rebuke to common-sense psychology. Adults can explain a syllogism, recite multiplication tables, even sound rational while running on habit and cultural scripts. Kids, by contrast, externalize the glitches. They reveal the mind’s “beta versions”: conservation tasks where quantity looks like it changes when a glass gets taller; counting that confuses order with magnitude; causal explanations that treat the world as animated and purposeful. Those mistakes aren’t noise to Piaget; they’re data, showing what kinds of structures must be built before “logical knowledge” feels effortless.
Context matters. Piaget is writing in a 20th-century moment when psychology is trying to earn its scientific stripes and when schooling is often treated as mere content delivery. His claim implies something more disruptive: knowledge isn’t poured in, it’s constructed through stages of interaction with the world. Studying children becomes a way to map the architecture of thought itself, and a subtle political argument about education: if development has a sequence, teaching that ignores it isn’t rigorous, it’s wishful.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|
More Quotes by Jean
Add to List




