"It makes no difference whether a work is naturalistic or abstract; every visual expression follows the same fundamental laws"
About this Quote
Hofmann is quietly torching one of modern art’s laziest arguments: that abstraction is a break from “real” seeing, while naturalism is faithful, honest, and therefore somehow exempt from theory. By insisting it makes “no difference,” he collapses the moral hierarchy viewers often bring to style. The point isn’t that all paintings look alike; it’s that all paintings, however they appear, have to solve the same problems of vision.
Coming from an artist-teacher who bridged European modernism and postwar American painting, the line reads like a studio directive disguised as philosophy. Hofmann’s classrooms trained a generation that would soon be praised (and attacked) for abandoning representation. His retort: representation never guaranteed truth in the first place. Whether you paint a figure or a field of color, you’re still negotiating the push-pull of space, the weight of color, the tension of edges, the choreography of attention. “Fundamental laws” is not mysticism; it’s craft talk with a backbone.
The subtext is democratizing and disciplinary at once. It grants abstraction legitimacy by tying it to the same visual grammar as Old Master illusionism, while also denying naturalism any special innocence. You don’t get to hide behind “I’m just copying what I see.” Hofmann implies that seeing is already an act of construction, and a painting’s integrity lies in how rigorously it organizes that construction on a flat surface. The quote works because it reframes the culture war over styles as a question of competence, not ideology: your subject matter can change, but the demands of visual coherence don’t negotiate.
Coming from an artist-teacher who bridged European modernism and postwar American painting, the line reads like a studio directive disguised as philosophy. Hofmann’s classrooms trained a generation that would soon be praised (and attacked) for abandoning representation. His retort: representation never guaranteed truth in the first place. Whether you paint a figure or a field of color, you’re still negotiating the push-pull of space, the weight of color, the tension of edges, the choreography of attention. “Fundamental laws” is not mysticism; it’s craft talk with a backbone.
The subtext is democratizing and disciplinary at once. It grants abstraction legitimacy by tying it to the same visual grammar as Old Master illusionism, while also denying naturalism any special innocence. You don’t get to hide behind “I’m just copying what I see.” Hofmann implies that seeing is already an act of construction, and a painting’s integrity lies in how rigorously it organizes that construction on a flat surface. The quote works because it reframes the culture war over styles as a question of competence, not ideology: your subject matter can change, but the demands of visual coherence don’t negotiate.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Hans
Add to List
