Science & Tech Quote by Jeremy Rifkin

Rifkin’s line is a scalpel disguised as a shrug. He opens with a concession - sure, maybe biotech’s glossy promises will pan out - then twists the blade: “That defies logic.” The move is rhetorical judo. By briefly granting the industry its best-case scenario, he sets up the real point: the burden of proof shouldn’t sit with the public to demonstrate harm; it belongs to the companies asking society to accept irreversible interventions.

The subtext is a critique of the corporate futurism that often accompanies life sciences: the idea that innovation is inherently self-justifying, that regulation is an obstacle course rather than a safety system, that risk is a PR problem. Rifkin isn’t claiming catastrophe is guaranteed. He’s arguing that certainty is the least credible posture in a domain defined by complex systems, long timelines, and unintended consequences. “Defies logic” targets the confident tone, not just the technology.

Context matters because biotech debates rarely happen in neutral terrain. They’re staged inside asymmetries: companies control data, fund studies, write narratives about progress, and externalize potential downsides onto patients, ecosystems, and future consumers. Rifkin, long skeptical of technological triumphalism, is tapping into a familiar pattern: industries selling disruption often market it as inevitability, then treat doubts as anti-science.

What makes the quote work is its compressed indictment of certainty. It frames “no problem whatsoever” as an absurd standard - a demand for perfect outcomes in an imperfect world - and forces the listener to notice how often that standard is smuggled into public consent.