"It may not be proper for me, perhaps, to let my feelings carry me further am therefore resigned to stop here, if sir, you think my particular reasons following too free, or will give offense to the House, which I would be sorry to be thought capable of intending"
About this Quote
A man famous for defiance suddenly performs restraint, and that tension is the point. Gadsden’s sentence is a careful little drama: he lets “my feelings” step onto the stage, then yanks them back before anyone else can. In a legislative setting where passion could be read as recklessness or vanity, he preemptively frames himself as both sincere and disciplined. The hedging (“perhaps,” “it may not be proper”) isn’t verbal weakness so much as procedural armor.
The specific intent is tactical. He wants to press an argument forcefully while signaling respect for the House’s decorum and hierarchy. By offering to “stop here” if his “particular reasons” are “too free,” he turns potential censure into a choice the chamber must own. If they silence him, they look thin-skinned; if they allow him, his candor gains legitimacy. Either way, he’s positioned himself as the reasonable party.
The subtext is also about reputation. “I would be sorry to be thought capable of intending” offense is the political version of “don’t mistake my bluntness for disloyalty.” In an era of factional suspicion and high-stakes revolutionary agitation, motives mattered as much as words. This is the rhetoric of insurgency trying to look like governance: a soldier’s intensity translated into parliamentary manners, so radical content can travel under the cover of humility.
The specific intent is tactical. He wants to press an argument forcefully while signaling respect for the House’s decorum and hierarchy. By offering to “stop here” if his “particular reasons” are “too free,” he turns potential censure into a choice the chamber must own. If they silence him, they look thin-skinned; if they allow him, his candor gains legitimacy. Either way, he’s positioned himself as the reasonable party.
The subtext is also about reputation. “I would be sorry to be thought capable of intending” offense is the political version of “don’t mistake my bluntness for disloyalty.” In an era of factional suspicion and high-stakes revolutionary agitation, motives mattered as much as words. This is the rhetoric of insurgency trying to look like governance: a soldier’s intensity translated into parliamentary manners, so radical content can travel under the cover of humility.
Quote Details
| Topic | Respect |
|---|
More Quotes by Christopher
Add to List




