"It seems to me that in our lifetime we have passed from the wreck of liberal humanism to the beginning of a new recognition of dogma: isn't it rather tremendous?"

Ruth Pitter's quote assesses a viewed cultural and ideological shift. The "wreck of liberal humanism" suggests a critical view of the decrease or failure of liberal humanist suitables, which traditionally focus on individual rights, reason, and rationality as the foundations for social development and ethical decision-making. Pitter suggests that, during her lifetime, these perfects have actually seen a downturn, revealing insufficiencies or vulnerabilities acquired in this worldview, regardless of its historical impact and accomplishments.

The expression "beginning of a brand-new recognition of dogma" suggests a shift towards an era where repaired beliefs, doctrines, or reliable principles are acquiring prominence. In contrast to liberal humanism's focus on specific flexibility and hesitation of authority, dogma suggests a renewal of outright facts or arranged belief systems, which may be spiritual, ideological, or political.

Pitter's tone captivates with "isn't it rather incredible?" which welcomes readers to evaluate this shift not simply as worrying or regressive however as substantial and effective. "Tremendous" here might convey the magnitude of modification or record a component of awe towards such a profound improvement in societal ideologies.

This shift could show social shifts toward structures that provide certainty and instructions in reaction to perceived mayhem or ethical ambiguity credited to the liberal humanist structure. It echoes historic cycles where periods of liberal idea are often followed by times of restored conservatism or ideological rigidity, as societies oscillate between change and stability.

In analyzing Pitter's words, we acknowledge this is not purely a recommendation or critique of either perspective however an observation of cultural dynamics. It challenges readers to be knowledgeable about underlying currents influencing social worths and structures, urging reflection on the balance in between liberal freedoms and structured belief systems governing cumulative life.