"It simply cannot be disputed that for decades the Palestinian leadership was more interested in there not being a Jewish state than in there being a Palestinian state"
About this Quote
Dershowitz builds this line like a courtroom summation: “simply cannot be disputed” isn’t an argument so much as a procedural maneuver, an attempt to preempt debate by treating a contested historical narrative as settled fact. Coming from a lawyer, the phrasing is the point. He’s not just stating a view; he’s trying to assign the burden of proof to anyone who disagrees, recasting disagreement as denial.
The structure sets a moral trap. By contrasting “not being a Jewish state” with “being a Palestinian state,” he frames Palestinian politics as essentially negative, reactive, even nihilistic. That binary doesn’t merely criticize strategy; it questions legitimacy. The subtext is that Palestinian aspirations were never principally about self-determination, but about vetoing Jewish self-determination. If that premise lands, it reshapes how an audience interprets everything that follows: failed negotiations become evidence of bad faith, resistance becomes obsession, and Israeli security claims gain rhetorical oxygen.
Context matters because this argument has long been a staple of pro-Israel advocacy in the U.S., especially in moments when peace talks collapse or violence spikes: it offers a clean explanatory story that feels psychologically satisfying. “For decades” flattens internal Palestinian divisions and shifting political realities into a single continuous motive, turning a complex national movement into a prosecutable intent.
What makes the line effective is its legalistic certainty and emotional insinuation. What makes it dangerous is the same thing: it sells a sweeping claim about collective intention while sounding like it’s merely calling balls and strikes.
The structure sets a moral trap. By contrasting “not being a Jewish state” with “being a Palestinian state,” he frames Palestinian politics as essentially negative, reactive, even nihilistic. That binary doesn’t merely criticize strategy; it questions legitimacy. The subtext is that Palestinian aspirations were never principally about self-determination, but about vetoing Jewish self-determination. If that premise lands, it reshapes how an audience interprets everything that follows: failed negotiations become evidence of bad faith, resistance becomes obsession, and Israeli security claims gain rhetorical oxygen.
Context matters because this argument has long been a staple of pro-Israel advocacy in the U.S., especially in moments when peace talks collapse or violence spikes: it offers a clean explanatory story that feels psychologically satisfying. “For decades” flattens internal Palestinian divisions and shifting political realities into a single continuous motive, turning a complex national movement into a prosecutable intent.
What makes the line effective is its legalistic certainty and emotional insinuation. What makes it dangerous is the same thing: it sells a sweeping claim about collective intention while sounding like it’s merely calling balls and strikes.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Alan
Add to List


