"It takes 15,000 casualties to train a major general"
About this Quote
The specific intent is twofold. First, it’s a grim reassurance to political leaders and fellow commanders that catastrophe has a payoff: even failed offensives are not “wasted” if they produce seasoned leadership. Second, it’s a disciplinary message to ambitious officers: competence is earned in the only classroom that matters, and the fee is paid by someone else. That “someone else” is, of course, the infantryman.
The subtext smuggles in an entire theory of command. Generals are not born; they’re forged under fire. The price tag implies inevitability, as if casualties were a natural resource to be consumed on the path to expertise. It also launderes responsibility. If 15,000 dead are simply the cost of creating a capable major general, then the slaughter becomes less a failure of imagination and more a rite of passage.
Context sharpens the cynicism. Foch comes out of the First World War’s attritional logic, when armies learned, too late and too slowly, how to coordinate artillery, movement, and communication. His remark reads like the dark corporate slogan of that era: leadership development, now with body counts.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Foch, Ferdinand. (2026, January 15). It takes 15,000 casualties to train a major general. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/it-takes-15000-casualties-to-train-a-major-general-47396/
Chicago Style
Foch, Ferdinand. "It takes 15,000 casualties to train a major general." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/it-takes-15000-casualties-to-train-a-major-general-47396/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"It takes 15,000 casualties to train a major general." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/it-takes-15000-casualties-to-train-a-major-general-47396/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.






