"It takes one person to forgive, it takes two people to be reunited"
About this Quote
Forgiveness is often sold as a neat, individual act: do the inner work, let it go, move on. Smedes snaps that tidy narrative in half. His line insists on a boundary that modern self-help sometimes blurs: you can clean your side of the street alone, but you cannot rebuild the whole neighborhood without the other resident showing up.
The intent is quietly corrective. By splitting “forgive” from “be reunited,” Smedes protects forgiveness from becoming a hostage negotiation. One person can choose to release resentment, stop rehearsing the injury, and refuse to let the past keep drafting their future. That’s agency. Reunification, though, is not therapy homework; it’s a mutual agreement, a shared risk. It demands accountability, changed behavior, and a willingness to meet again in the same room where harm happened.
The subtext is a warning to anyone tempted to use “forgiveness” as a pressure tactic: forgiving doesn’t mean forgetting, excusing, or returning. It also pushes back on the romantic plotline where closure equals reconciliation. Sometimes forgiveness is the compassionate exit ramp, not the on-ramp back into intimacy.
Context matters because Smedes writes from a moral and often religious tradition that takes reconciliation seriously but doesn’t sentimentalize it. The sentence has the cadence of pastoral realism: mercy can be unilateral, trust cannot. In an era that confuses emotional maturity with endless access, the quote reads like permission. You can forgive and still require two signatures for the relationship to reopen.
The intent is quietly corrective. By splitting “forgive” from “be reunited,” Smedes protects forgiveness from becoming a hostage negotiation. One person can choose to release resentment, stop rehearsing the injury, and refuse to let the past keep drafting their future. That’s agency. Reunification, though, is not therapy homework; it’s a mutual agreement, a shared risk. It demands accountability, changed behavior, and a willingness to meet again in the same room where harm happened.
The subtext is a warning to anyone tempted to use “forgiveness” as a pressure tactic: forgiving doesn’t mean forgetting, excusing, or returning. It also pushes back on the romantic plotline where closure equals reconciliation. Sometimes forgiveness is the compassionate exit ramp, not the on-ramp back into intimacy.
Context matters because Smedes writes from a moral and often religious tradition that takes reconciliation seriously but doesn’t sentimentalize it. The sentence has the cadence of pastoral realism: mercy can be unilateral, trust cannot. In an era that confuses emotional maturity with endless access, the quote reads like permission. You can forgive and still require two signatures for the relationship to reopen.
Quote Details
| Topic | Forgiveness |
|---|
More Quotes by Lewis
Add to List


