"It takes two to quarrel, but only one to end it"
About this Quote
The subtext is less kumbaya than power-aware. Ending a quarrel isn’t portrayed as a mutual epiphany; it’s an act of will. That framing matters because it smuggles in a moral challenge: if you can stop it alone, continuing is a choice, not a fate. It also reframes “backing down” as agency rather than surrender. Prior, a poet and diplomat steeped in courtly maneuvering, understood that public disputes aren’t just emotional storms; they’re performances with reputational stakes. In that world, the person who can disengage first isn’t weaker - they’re strategically literate.
There’s a sly pragmatism here, too. Quarrels persist because they offer rewards: attention, leverage, the pleasure of righteous indignation. Prior’s sentence breaks the spell by making exit sound simple, almost procedural. One person can end it - by refusing escalation, changing the subject, offering a face-saving concession, or withholding the next clever retort. The line’s elegance is its trap: once you accept the logic, you lose the alibi.
Quote Details
| Topic | Forgiveness |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Prior, Matthew. (2026, January 15). It takes two to quarrel, but only one to end it. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/it-takes-two-to-quarrel-but-only-one-to-end-it-57407/
Chicago Style
Prior, Matthew. "It takes two to quarrel, but only one to end it." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/it-takes-two-to-quarrel-but-only-one-to-end-it-57407/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"It takes two to quarrel, but only one to end it." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/it-takes-two-to-quarrel-but-only-one-to-end-it-57407/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.













